Skip to content
https://wordpress.org

Performance

· 15 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
86
GRADE
B
FIX
3
REVIEW
3
PASS
6
INFO
3

Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates

Mobile Desktop
97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

466 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.21 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

18 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

517 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.29 s

Page Load Progression

375 ms
750 ms
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.2 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Checks
15
6 PASS 3 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
Page Weight Budget
Action
2.4 MB transferred, 50 requests
FIX
2.4 MB transferred, 50 requests
Info::
Page weighs 3.6 MB (2.4 MB transferred)
Warning::
Images are 1.7 MB — compress or use modern formats
Convert images to WebP/AVIF and resize to display dimensions to reduce transfer size.
Got: 1.7 MB
Info::
CSS is 203 KB — consider purging unused styles
Remove unused CSS rules with tools like PurgeCSS to reduce stylesheet size.
Got: 203 KB
Info::
50 HTTP requests
Info::
Estimated 0.50 g CO2 per page load
2.4 MB / 2.4 MB budget
2.4 MB transferred
50 requests
0.50 g CO2 per page load
Images 1.7 MiB 69%
JavaScript 329.7 KiB 13%
CSS 202.5 KiB 8%
Fonts 187.0 KiB 8%
HTML 31.2 KiB 1%
Other 1.7 KiB 0%
Other 832 B 0%
0 2.4 MB 4.9 MB
Approaching limit

Convert images to WebP/AVIF and resize to display dimensions to reduce transfer size.

Why this matters

Image bandwidth is high — modern formats (WebP/AVIF) and resizing typically cut it 50%+.

Source: web.dev

Remove unused CSS rules with tools like PurgeCSS to reduce stylesheet size.

Why this matters

CSS bundle is large — purge unused styles (PurgeCSS, Tailwind JIT) to reduce CSS payload.

Source: web.dev

D
Third-Party Impact
Action
81% third-party, 0 ms blocking
FIX
81% third-party, 0 ms blocking
Warning::
Third-party code accounts for 81% of page weight (2.0 MiB of 2.4 MiB)
Info::
Third-party blocking time is low (0 ms)
19%
81%
First-party Third-party
F
HTTP Caching
Action
No cache headers
FIX
No cache headers
Warning::
No Cache-Control header found
Browsers will use heuristic caching, which can be unpredictable. Set explicit cache headers.

No Cache-Control header

Adding a Cache-Control header can significantly improve repeat-visit performance.

B
Image Optimization
21 images, 0 KB saveable
REVIEW
21 images, 0 KB saveable
Info::
All images are well-optimized
21 images 1.7 MB
0 oversized -0 KB
7 legacy format
0 missing dimensions CLS risk
B
JS Bundles
10 scripts, 131 KB unused
REVIEW
10 scripts, 131 KB unused
Warning::
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-CG6G...: 67 KB unused (39%)
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
Warning::
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-P24...: 64 KB unused (49%)
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
Info::
Total unused JavaScript: 131 KB
131 KB unused JavaScript

Downloaded but never executed on this page.

ScriptSizeUnusedMinifiedParty
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-CG6GJ50G8J&cx=c&gtm=4e6431171 KB67 KB (39%)✓3rd
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-P24PF4B131 KB64 KB (49%)✓3rd
https://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/blocks/language-suggest/build/front.js?ver=6f71d5ef610256d46dec1 KB—✓1st
https://wordpress.org/wp-content/plugins/gutenberg/build/modules/interactivity/index.min.js?ver=4d2a3a72c7410d54888115 KB—✓1st
https://wordpress.org/wp-content/plugins/gutenberg/build/modules/block-library/navigation/view.min.js?ver=96a846e1d7b789c39ab9-202403081 KB—✓1st
https://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/blocks/time/build/view.js?ver=385bfe9134bf98c52dda1 KB—✓1st
https://stats.wp.com/e-202615.js2 KB—✓3rd
https://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/blocks/global-header-footer/js/view.js?ver=17513359063 KB—✓1st
blob:https://wordpress.org/fea5f79e-c430-4c8a-aedf-c7e8cf2f7cb3-0 KB—✓3rd
https://wordpress.org/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=7.1-alpha-622135 KB—✓1st

Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.

Why this matters

This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.

Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage

Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.

Why this matters

This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.

Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Text Compression
All text resources are compressed
PASS
All text resources are compressed
Info::
All text resources are compressed
All text resources are properly compressed.
A+
JS Execution Cost
386ms total JS execution
PASS
386ms total JS execution
Info::
https://wordpress.org/: 131ms CPU time
Info::
Unattributable: 99ms CPU time
Info::
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-CG6G...: 88ms CPU time
Info::
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-P24...: 69ms CPU time
Warning::
Third-party scripts: 255ms (66% of total)

Main Thread Breakdown

Script Evaluation 39% Other 23% Style & Layout 19% Parse HTML & CSS 9% Script Parsing & Compilation 8%
ScriptTotalScriptingParse/CompileParty
https://wordpress.org/131ms2ms1ms1st
Unattributable99ms26ms0ms3rd
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-CG6GJ50G8J&cx=c&gtm=4e643188ms71ms16ms3rd
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-P24PF4B69ms52ms16ms3rd
A+
Font Loading
3 fonts (187 KB)
PASS
3 fonts (187 KB)
Info::
3 font(s) use font-display: swap (FOUT risk but functional)

Web fonts

3

187 KB total

Render-blocking

0

of 3

Dominant font-display

swap

Most common across fonts

Font loading timeline
Transfer FOIT (block) FOUT (swap)
0 ms 500 ms 1.0 s FCP 466 ms LCP 1.2 shttps://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/global-fonts/Inter/Inter-latin.woff2Inter-latin.woff2 https://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/global-fonts/Inter/Inter-latin.woff2 — 76.0 KiB — 0 ms — font-display: swaphttps://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/global-fonts/EB-Garamond/EBGaramond-latin.woff2EBGaramond-latin.woff2 https://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/global-fonts/EB-Garamond/EBGaramond-latin.woff2 — 108.5 KiB — 0 ms — font-display: swaphttps://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/global-fonts/Inter/Inter-arrows.woff2Inter-arrows.woff2 https://wordpress.org/wp-content/mu-plugins/pub-sync/global-fonts/Inter/Inter-arrows.woff2 — 2.5 KiB — 0 ms — font-display: swap
Inter-latin.woff2 woff2 swap
Size 76 KB
Load time 0 ms
Start 0 ms
Risk FOUT — text flashes from fallback to web font
EBGaramond-latin.woff2 woff2 swap
Size 108 KB
Load time 0 ms
Start 0 ms
Risk FOUT — text flashes from fallback to web font
  • Subset this font — over 100 KB suggests Latin Extended or full glyph coverage that most pages don't need
Inter-arrows.woff2 woff2 swap
Size 3 KB
Load time 0 ms
Start 0 ms
Risk FOUT — text flashes from fallback to web font
Optimization checklist
  • Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
  • Use woff2 format for all fonts
  • Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
  • Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)

Fixing the unchecked items could save ~54 KB and ~108 ms

A+
Resource Caching
All resources properly cached
PASS
All resources properly cached
Info::
No caching issues found
All static resources have appropriate caching headers.
A+
Critical Rendering Path
No render-blocking resources
PASS
No render-blocking resources
Info::
No render-blocking resources detected
A+
Resource Hints
No optimization needed
PASS
No optimization needed
Info::
No resource hint issues
Network Waterfall
50 requests over 0ms
INFO

Performance analysis not available for this result.

Third-Party Script Cost
Per-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headers
INFO
66% of JavaScript execution is third-party
First-party Third-party 255ms · 302KB · $3/mo
Unattributable
Other
Optional
Execution 99ms
Transfer 0 KB
Monthly Cost $1/mo
Google Tag Manager
Tag Manager
Optional
Execution 88ms
Transfer 171 KB
Unused 39%
Monthly Cost $1/mo
Google Tag Manager
Tag Manager
Optional
Execution 69ms
Transfer 131 KB
Unused 49%
Monthly Cost $1/mo

66% of JavaScript execution time comes from third-party scripts.

Why this matters

Third-party scripts (analytics, ads, social, A/B testing) often dominate execution time — every one is a perf-and-privacy tax.

Learn more ▾

Each third-party script is a black box: you don't control when it loads, what it executes, or how much it grows. They often account for a major share of total blocking time on average sites (HTTP Archive's Web Almanac documents the trend). Audit which ones you actually need, defer the rest, and use facade patterns (lite-youtube, lite-vimeo) for embedded media.

Source: web.dev / HTTP Archive Web Almanac

How third-party costs are calculated

Real-User Performance (CrUX)
Field metrics from the Chrome User Experience Report
INFO

Chrome User Experience (CrUX)

Real-user metrics from the Chrome UX Report (2026-03-09 — 2026-04-05)

LCP (p75)

2859 ms

69% good

INP (p75)

52 ms

95% good

CLS (p75)

0.010

99% good

FCP (p75)

2846 ms

TTFB (p75)

943 ms

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback