Skip to content
https://wp.me

Infrastructure

· 9 checks — DNS, redirects, IPv6, crawlability, URL variants, and domain intelligence rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
85
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
5
INFO
0
Probed from Madrid, Spain
302 Found
Checks
9
5 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
CDN & Delivery
Action
No CDN detected
FIX
No CDN detected
Warning::
No CDN detected
A CDN can significantly improve load times for users around the world by caching content at edge nodes closer to them.
No CDN detected

Consider using a CDN to improve global delivery speed and reduce origin load.

C
IPv6 Readiness
Action
No IPv6 support
REVIEW
No IPv6 support
Info::
No IPv6 (AAAA) records found
IPv6 support is increasingly important for global accessibility. About 40% of internet users have IPv6 connectivity.
No IPv6 Support
About 40% of internet users have IPv6. Consider adding AAAA records.

IPv6 support is increasingly important for global accessibility. About 40% of internet users have IPv6 connectivity.

Why this matters

No AAAA records — same impact as 'no IPv6 (AAAA) records'; IPv6-preferring clients pay extra latency falling back to IPv4.

Source: Google IPv6 stats

B
Crawlability
no robots.txt, no sitemap
REVIEW
no robots.txt, no sitemap
Info::
No robots.txt found
robots.txt is optional but recommended. It tells search engine crawlers which pages to index.
Info::
No sitemap.xml found
A sitemap helps search engines discover and index your pages more efficiently.

robots.txt is optional but recommended. It tells search engine crawlers which pages to index.

Why this matters

No robots.txt — crawlers fetch /robots.txt and get 404; not breaking but means default crawl behavior with no directives or sitemap reference.

Learn more

A minimal robots.txt with `User-agent: * / Allow: / / Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xml` covers the basics. Without it, crawlers behave fine but lose the sitemap signal and can't be selectively blocked from crawl-traps.

Source: robotstxt.org

A sitemap helps search engines discover and index your pages more efficiently.

Why this matters

No sitemap.xml — Google relies on crawl-graph discovery alone, slowing indexing of deep or fresh URLs.

Learn more

A sitemap accelerates Google's discovery of new and updated content. Most CMSes auto-generate one; static-site frameworks need a build-step plugin. Reference it from robots.txt and submit in Search Console to confirm Google can fetch it.

Source: sitemaps.org / Google Search Central

robots.txt No robots.txt found

No robots.txt found

This is fine for most sites — a missing robots.txt allows all crawling by default.

sitemap.xml No sitemap found

No sitemap found

Adding a sitemap helps search engines discover your pages.

B
TLS Certificate Expiry & Recommendations
80 days until leaf cert expires — 3 issues to address
REVIEW

Certificate validity

80
days left
0d 30d 60d 90d+

Recommended actions

  • Enable HSTS: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • Enable DNSSEC on your domain for DNS spoofing protection
  • Enable OCSP stapling on your TLS server to remove a CA roundtrip and protect user privacy
A+
DNS Records
2 A records, 27 ms lookup
PASS
2 A records, 27 ms lookup
Info::
Resolves to 2 IPv4 address(es)
Got: 192.0.78.24, 192.0.78.25
Info::
No IPv6 (AAAA) records
Info::
3 nameserver(s) configured
Got: ns3.wordpress.com, ns1.wordpress.com, ns2.wordpress.com
Info::
No MX records — email not configured via DNS
Info::
CAA records not checked
CAA record lookup requires a specialized DNS resolver. This check will be available in a future update.
Info::
No SPF record found in TXT records
SPF helps prevent email spoofing. Add a TXT record starting with 'v=spf1'.
Info::
DNS resolution time: 27 ms
Got: 27 ms
A192.0.78.24, 192.0.78.25
AAAA
CNAME
NSns3.wordpress.com, ns1.wordpress.com, ns2.wordpress.com
MX
TXT
CAALookup not available with standard resolver
Resolved in 27 ms

CAA record lookup requires a specialized DNS resolver. This check will be available in a future update.

Why this matters

Informational: CAA (Certification Authority Authorization) records weren't checked in this scan.

SPF helps prevent email spoofing. Add a TXT record starting with 'v=spf1'.

Why this matters

Without SPF, receiving servers can't validate sending IPs — your domain is easier to spoof in phishing.

Learn more

SPF complements DMARC. Both should be published. SPF records list authorized sending IPs (e.g., `v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all` for Google Workspace). After publishing, verify in Google Postmaster Tools or mxtoolbox.

Source: RFC 7208 (SPF)

A
Redirect Chain
1 redirect(s), 425 ms total
PASS
1 redirect(s), 425 ms total
Info::
Single redirect
Got: https://wp.me → https://wordpress.com/ (302)
Info::
Uses 302 (temporary) redirect
If permanent, use 301 instead.
Got: https://wp.me
Info::
Cross-domain redirect detected

https://wp.me

298 ms · HTTP/1.1

302

https://wordpress.com/

127 ms · HTTP/1.1 FINAL

#URLStatusTimeProtocolServer
1https://wp.me302298 msHTTP/1.1nginx
2https://wordpress.com/200127 msHTTP/1.1nginx

See the visual redirect chain in the HTTP Probe tab →

If permanent, use 301 instead.

Why this matters

302 (Found) is for genuinely temporary redirects — if this redirect is permanent, switch to 301 to preserve SEO equity.

Learn more

Search engines treat 302 as temporary, keeping the original URL indexed and not transferring full link equity to the destination. Use 301 (Moved Permanently) for permanent redirects (HTTP→HTTPS, www-vs-non-www, URL restructures).

Source: Google Search Central

A
URL Variants
www/non-www, trailing slash, HTTP→HTTPS
PASS
www/non-www, trailing slash, HTTP→HTTPS
Warning::
HTTP→HTTPS redirect uses 302 instead of 301
Got: 302 temporary redirect Expected: 301 permanent redirect

www / non-www

https://www.wp.me/
200https://wp.me/

HTTP → HTTPS

302http://wp.me/ https://wordpress.com/

Use 301 (permanent) instead of 302 (temporary)

A+
Domain Intelligence
wp.me — via MarkMonitor Inc., 16 years, 11 months old, hosted on WordPress.com (Automattic)
PASS
wp.me — via MarkMonitor Inc., 16 years, 11 months old, hosted on WordPress.com (Automattic)
Info::
Domain registered until Jul 24, 2026 (3 months remaining)
Info::
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.
Info::
Registrar lock is enabled
Domain cannot be transferred without explicit unlock from the registrar. This protects against unauthorized transfers.
Info::
Hosting: WordPress.com (Automattic)
Got: AS2635
Domain expiry

8 days

July 24, 2026

SSL certificate

80 days

Issued by Let's Encrypt

Domain age

16 years, 11 months

Registered July 24, 2009

DNSSEC

Status unknown

Protects against DNS spoofing

Hosting

WordPress.com (Automattic)

ASN AS2635

192.0.78.24

Registrar

MarkMonitor Inc.

Locked 3 NS records
Expiry timeline
Today
+1 year
Domain expiry SSL expiry Danger zone (≤30 days)
Recommended actions
  • Renew the domain or enable auto-renewal to prevent accidental expiry
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc.
Created July 24, 2009 (16 years, 11 months ago)
Expires July 24, 2026 (3 months)
Last Updated November 4, 2025
Name Servers ns2.wordpress.com, ns1.wordpress.com, ns3.wordpress.com
Registrant Automattic, Inc.
Hosting
IP Address 192.0.78.24
ASN AS2635 (AUTOMATTIC - Automattic, Inc, US)
Provider WordPress.com (Automattic)
Data source: whois (1.5s)

Domain cannot be transferred without explicit unlock from the registrar. This protects against unauthorized transfers.

Why this matters

Registrar lock (clientTransferProhibited et al.) prevents unauthorized domain transfers — strongest defense against domain hijacking.

Source: ICANN / domain-security best practice

A+
HTTP Probe Timing
Total 121 ms — DNS, TCP, TLS, TTFB, content transfer breakdown
PASS
DNS Lookup DNS Lookup — time to resolve the domain name to an IP address.
21 ms
TCP Connect TCP Connect — time to establish a TCP connection to the server.
0 ms
TLS Handshake TLS Handshake — time to complete the HTTPS encryption handshake.
3 ms
Time to First Byte Time to First Byte — how long the server takes to respond with the first byte of data.
121 ms
Total Time Total request time from DNS lookup through full response.
121 ms

Connection waterfall

DNS Lookup 21 ms TCP Connect 0 ms TLS Handshake 3 ms Server Processing 97 ms Content Transfer 0 ms
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback