Skip to content
https://yandex.ru

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.32g CO2 per view
FIX
1.32g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.32g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.7 MB, producing an estimated 1.32g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.24g, network 0.23g, end-user device 0.85g.
Got: 1.32g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 158.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 158.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 19797 smartphones.

1.32g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 30% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.7 MB

Your site
1.32g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.24g
Network
0.23g
End-user device
0.85g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.2 kg · Annual: 158.4 kg · ≈ 19797 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
70th percentile
FIX
70th percentile
Warning::
1.32g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 30% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 70th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.32g

70th percentile

Cleaner than 30% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 120% more
vs Target 164% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
84% efficient
REVIEW
84% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 84%
An estimated 754 KB (16%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 754 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.21g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
84% efficient

Total waste: 754 KB (16% of page weight)

Unused JS 754 KB

0.21g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4772 KB
Theoretical minimum 4017 KB
Potential savings 754 KB (0.21g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
90% cached
PASS
90% cached
Info::
90% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 472 KB (vs 4772 KB first visit). 152 of 159 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.19g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.13g CO2 (first visit: 1.32g)
First visit
4772 KB
Repeat visit
472 KB

90% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.19g CO2 per returning visitor

152 resources served from cache · 7 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback