Skip to content

Category: Rich text editors

Froala Editor

Based on 4 real audits

42
Avg. Performance
92
Avg. Accessibility
85
Avg. Best Practices
90
Avg. SEO
63
Avg. Security
73
Avg. Composite
42 /100
Avg. Performance
239 ms
Avg. TTFB
73 /100
Avg. Composite
4
Sites Audited

How Froala Editor sites compare

Froala Editor sites tend to score below average on performance (42/100), compared to the global average of 66/100.

Recent Audits

See all 4 websites using Froala Editor →
SitePerformanceGradeAudited
psychiatry.org58C2026-04-21
thestar.com.my15D2026-04-21
alz.org34C2026-04-21
rsc.org64C2026-04-21

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Froala Editor also commonly use:

Google Font API Font scripts 4Font Awesome Font scripts 4Open Graph Miscellaneous 4Microsoft Analytics 4Bootstrap UI frameworks 3Google Search Console Analytics 3Google Tag Manager Tag managers 3jQuery JavaScript libraries 3OneTrust Cookie compliance 3Facebook SDK Analytics 2

Compare with...

Froala Editor vs Google Font APIFroala Editor vs Font AwesomeFroala Editor vs Open GraphFroala Editor vs MicrosoftFroala Editor vs BootstrapFroala Editor vs Google Search ConsoleFroala Editor vs Google Tag ManagerFroala Editor vs jQueryFroala Editor vs OneTrustFroala Editor vs Facebook SDK

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Froala Editor sites?
Based on 4 real audits, Froala Editor sites score an average of 42/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Froala Editor compare on web security?
Froala Editor sites score an average security grade of 63/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Froala Editor websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Froala Editor sites is 239ms based on 4 audits.
How can I improve my Froala Editor site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Froala Editor site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Froala Editor site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback