Skip to content

Category: Miscellaneous

SWC

Based on 27 real audits

30
Avg. Performance
87
Avg. Accessibility
80
Avg. Best Practices
91
Avg. SEO
64
Avg. Security
72
Avg. Composite
30 /100
Avg. Performance
349 ms
Avg. TTFB
72 /100
Avg. Composite
27
Sites Audited

How SWC sites compare

SWC sites tend to score below average on performance (30/100), compared to the global average of 66/100.

Recent Audits

See all 26 websites using SWC →
SitePerformanceGradeAudited
krone.at28C2026-04-22
anaconda.com29C2026-04-22
montana.edu9D2026-04-22
buzzsumo.com68C2026-04-22
greenhouse.io41C2026-04-22
smu.edu26C2026-04-22
epicurious.com26C2026-04-22
vogue.co.uk16C2026-04-21
pitchfork.com41C2026-04-21
cntraveler.com24C2026-04-21

Commonly Used With

Sites that use SWC also commonly use:

parcel Miscellaneous 27Open Graph Miscellaneous 26core-js JavaScript libraries 24Google Tag Manager Tag managers 23Google Search Console Analytics 20Microsoft Analytics 17Google Workspace Email 16DoubleClick Floodlight Advertising 16Priority Hints Performance 15Google Analytics Analytics 15

Compare with...

SWC vs parcelSWC vs Open GraphSWC vs core-jsSWC vs Google Tag ManagerSWC vs Google Search ConsoleSWC vs MicrosoftSWC vs Google WorkspaceSWC vs DoubleClick FloodlightSWC vs Priority HintsSWC vs Google Analytics

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for SWC sites?
Based on 27 real audits, SWC sites score an average of 30/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does SWC compare on web security?
SWC sites score an average security grade of 64/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for SWC websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for SWC sites is 349ms based on 27 audits.
How can I improve my SWC site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your SWC site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your SWC site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback