Skip to content

Category: Miscellaneous

SWC

Based on 29 real audits

32
Avg. Performance
87
Avg. Accessibility
80
Avg. Best Practices
90
Avg. SEO
65
Avg. Security
73
Avg. Composite
32 /100
Avg. Performance
333 ms
Avg. TTFB
73 /100
Avg. Composite
29
Sites Audited

How SWC sites compare

SWC sites tend to score below average on performance (32/100), compared to the global average of 60/100.

Recent Audits

See all 27 websites using SWC →
SitePerformanceGradeAudited
amista.cz82B2026-10-26
wired.com30C2026-09-27
krone.at28C2026-04-22
anaconda.com29C2026-04-22
montana.edu9D2026-04-22
buzzsumo.com68C2026-04-22
greenhouse.io41C2026-04-22
smu.edu26C2026-04-22
epicurious.com26C2026-04-22
vogue.co.uk16C2026-04-21

Commonly Used With

Sites that use SWC also commonly use:

parcel Miscellaneous 29Open Graph Miscellaneous 28core-js JavaScript libraries 25Google Tag Manager Tag managers 24Google Search Console Analytics 21Microsoft Analytics 19Google Workspace Email 17DoubleClick Floodlight Advertising 17jQuery JavaScript libraries 16RSS Miscellaneous 16

Compare with...

SWC vs parcelSWC vs Open GraphSWC vs core-jsSWC vs Google Tag ManagerSWC vs Google Search ConsoleSWC vs MicrosoftSWC vs Google WorkspaceSWC vs DoubleClick FloodlightSWC vs jQuerySWC vs RSS

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for SWC sites?
Based on 29 real audits, SWC sites score an average of 32/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does SWC compare on web security?
SWC sites score an average security grade of 65/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for SWC websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for SWC sites is 333ms based on 29 audits.
How can I improve my SWC site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your SWC site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your SWC site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback