Skip to content

core-js vs Fresh Relevance

Based on 1599 and 1 real audits

View core-js details | View Fresh Relevance details
Metriccore-jsFresh RelevanceWinner
Performance3637Fresh Relevance
Accessibility8894Fresh Relevance
Best Practices8477core-js
SEO91100Fresh Relevance
Security6560core-js
TTFB379ms227msFresh Relevance
Composite7270core-js
Performance
core-js
36
Fresh Relevance
37
Accessibility
core-js
88
Fresh Relevance
94
Security
core-js
65
Fresh Relevance
60
SEO
core-js
91
Fresh Relevance
100
Composite
core-js
72
Fresh Relevance
70

Fresh Relevance outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 72). core-js leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Fresh Relevance

Choose Fresh Relevance when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1599 audited core-js sites and 1 audited Fresh Relevance sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, core-js or Fresh Relevance?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Fresh Relevance sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, core-js or Fresh Relevance?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, core-js or Fresh Relevance?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fresh Relevance (94 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, core-js or Fresh Relevance?
Fresh Relevance sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), core-js or Fresh Relevance?
Fresh Relevance sites show lower Time to First Byte (227 ms vs 379 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose core-js or Fresh Relevance for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Fresh Relevance scores higher on overall composite score while core-js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback