Skip to content

Fresh Relevance

Based on 1 real audits

37
Avg. Performance
94
Avg. Accessibility
77
Avg. Best Practices
100
Avg. SEO
60
Avg. Security
70
Avg. Composite
37 /100
Avg. Performance
227 ms
Avg. TTFB
70 /100
Avg. Composite
1
Sites Audited

How Fresh Relevance sites compare

Fresh Relevance sites tend to score below average on performance (37/100), compared to the global average of 46/100.

Recent Audits

SitePerformanceGradeAudited
astronomy.com37C2026-04-22

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Fresh Relevance also commonly use:

Bulma Framework 1Chartbeat Analytics 1Cloudflare CDN 1Cloudflare Bot Management Security 1core-js JavaScript libraries 1Facebook Analytics 1Funding Choices Cookie compliance 1Glide.js JavaScript libraries 1Google Analytics Analytics 1Google Font API Font scripts 1

Compare with...

Fresh Relevance vs BulmaFresh Relevance vs ChartbeatFresh Relevance vs CloudflareFresh Relevance vs Cloudflare Bot ManagementFresh Relevance vs core-jsFresh Relevance vs FacebookFresh Relevance vs Funding ChoicesFresh Relevance vs Glide.jsFresh Relevance vs Google AnalyticsFresh Relevance vs Google Font API

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Fresh Relevance sites?
Based on 1 real audits, Fresh Relevance sites score an average of 37/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Fresh Relevance compare on web security?
Fresh Relevance sites score an average security grade of 60/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Fresh Relevance websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Fresh Relevance sites is 227ms based on 1 audits.
How can I improve my Fresh Relevance site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Fresh Relevance site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Fresh Relevance site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback