Skip to content

Facebook vs Fresh Relevance

Based on 1417 and 1 real audits

View Facebook details | View Fresh Relevance details
MetricFacebookFresh RelevanceWinner
Performance3837Facebook
Accessibility8994Fresh Relevance
Best Practices8477Facebook
SEO90100Fresh Relevance
Security6760Facebook
TTFB280ms227msFresh Relevance
Composite7370Facebook
Performance
Facebook
38
Fresh Relevance
37
Accessibility
Facebook
89
Fresh Relevance
94
Security
Facebook
67
Fresh Relevance
60
SEO
Facebook
90
Fresh Relevance
100
Composite
Facebook
73
Fresh Relevance
70

Facebook outperforms Fresh Relevance in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Fresh Relevance leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Fresh Relevance

Choose Fresh Relevance when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1417 audited Facebook sites and 1 audited Fresh Relevance sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Facebook or Fresh Relevance?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Facebook or Fresh Relevance?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Facebook or Fresh Relevance?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fresh Relevance (94 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Facebook or Fresh Relevance?
Fresh Relevance sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Facebook or Fresh Relevance?
Fresh Relevance sites show lower Time to First Byte (227 ms vs 280 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Facebook or Fresh Relevance for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Facebook may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback