| Metric | Cxense | Prebid | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 33 | Prebid |
| Accessibility | 84 | 87 | Prebid |
| Best Practices | 80 | 81 | Prebid |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 64 | Prebid |
| TTFB | 236ms | 266ms | Cxense |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Prebid |
Prebid outperforms Cxense in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Cxense leads in TTFB.
Choose Cxense when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Prebid when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 75 audited Cxense sites and 321 audited Prebid sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback