Skip to content

Category: Personalisation

Cxense

Based on 75 real audits

29
Avg. Performance
84
Avg. Accessibility
80
Avg. Best Practices
90
Avg. SEO
63
Avg. Security
71
Avg. Composite
29 /100
Avg. Performance
236 ms
Avg. TTFB
71 /100
Avg. Composite
75
Sites Audited

How Cxense sites compare

Cxense sites tend to score below average on performance (29/100), compared to the global average of 66/100.

Recent Audits

See all 72 websites using Cxense →
SitePerformanceGradeAudited
uol.com.br28C2026-05-25
krone.at28C2026-04-22
nippon.com19C2026-04-22
postandcourier.com26C2026-04-22
tagesanzeiger.ch48C2026-04-22
rappler.com27C2026-04-22
morgenpost.de46C2026-04-22
thebulletin.org31C2026-04-22
townhall.com29C2026-04-22
diepresse.com39C2026-04-22

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Cxense also commonly use:

Google Tag Manager Tag managers 75Open Graph Miscellaneous 68Google Search Console Analytics 68core-js JavaScript libraries 65Piano Personalisation 62Google Analytics Analytics 59DoubleClick Floodlight Advertising 49Microsoft Analytics 47Priority Hints Performance 44Prebid Advertising 41

Compare with...

Cxense vs Google Tag ManagerCxense vs Open GraphCxense vs Google Search ConsoleCxense vs core-jsCxense vs PianoCxense vs Google AnalyticsCxense vs DoubleClick FloodlightCxense vs MicrosoftCxense vs Priority HintsCxense vs Prebid

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Cxense sites?
Based on 75 real audits, Cxense sites score an average of 29/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Cxense compare on web security?
Cxense sites score an average security grade of 63/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Cxense websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Cxense sites is 236ms based on 75 audits.
How can I improve my Cxense site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Cxense site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Cxense site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback