Based on 46 and 359 real audits
| Metric | Didomi | Google Publisher Tag | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 32 | Didomi |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Didomi |
| Best Practices | 89 | 81 | Didomi |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Didomi |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 219ms | 322ms | Didomi |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Didomi outperforms Google Publisher Tag in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Google Publisher Tag leads in no categories.
Choose Didomi when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Publisher Tag doesn't clearly lead Didomi in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 46 audited Didomi sites and 359 audited Google Publisher Tag sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback