Based on 380 and 9 real audits
| Metric | Fastly | GOV.UK Toolkit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 82 | GOV.UK Toolkit |
| Accessibility | 91 | 100 | GOV.UK Toolkit |
| Best Practices | 89 | 100 | GOV.UK Toolkit |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | GOV.UK Toolkit |
| Security | 66 | 82 | GOV.UK Toolkit |
| TTFB | 148ms | 194ms | Fastly |
| Composite | 74 | 86 | GOV.UK Toolkit |
GOV.UK Toolkit outperforms Fastly in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (86 vs 74). Fastly leads in TTFB.
Choose Fastly when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose GOV.UK Toolkit when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 380 audited Fastly sites and 9 audited GOV.UK Toolkit sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback