Based on 8 and 359 real audits
| Metric | Gemius | Google Publisher Tag | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 32 | Gemius |
| Accessibility | 82 | 87 | Google Publisher Tag |
| Best Practices | 83 | 81 | Gemius |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Gemius |
| Security | 62 | 64 | Google Publisher Tag |
| TTFB | 360ms | 322ms | Google Publisher Tag |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Google Publisher Tag |
Google Publisher Tag outperforms Gemius in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Gemius leads in performance, best practices, SEO.
Choose Gemius when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Publisher Tag when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 8 audited Gemius sites and 359 audited Google Publisher Tag sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback