Based on 8 and 355 real audits
| Metric | Gemius | Google Publisher Tag | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 32 | Gemius |
| Accessibility | 82 | 87 | Google Publisher Tag |
| Best Practices | 83 | 80 | Gemius |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Gemius |
| Security | 62 | 64 | Google Publisher Tag |
| TTFB | 360ms | 293ms | Google Publisher Tag |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Gemius and Google Publisher Tag are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Gemius has a composite score of 71 while Google Publisher Tag scores 71.
Choose Gemius when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Publisher Tag when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 8 audited Gemius sites and 355 audited Google Publisher Tag sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback