Based on 356 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Publisher Tag | Gravito | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 19 | Google Publisher Tag |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 81 | 96 | Gravito |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Gravito |
| Security | 64 | 65 | Gravito |
| TTFB | 293ms | 121ms | Gravito |
| Composite | 71 | 68 | Google Publisher Tag |
Gravito outperforms Google Publisher Tag in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (68 vs 71). Google Publisher Tag leads in performance, composite score.
Choose Google Publisher Tag when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Gravito when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 356 audited Google Publisher Tag sites and 1 audited Gravito sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback