Based on 355 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Google Publisher Tag | Kilkaya | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 34 | Kilkaya |
| Accessibility | 87 | 85 | Google Publisher Tag |
| Best Practices | 80 | 76 | Google Publisher Tag |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | Kilkaya |
| Security | 64 | 57 | Google Publisher Tag |
| TTFB | 293ms | 210ms | Kilkaya |
| Composite | 71 | 69 | Google Publisher Tag |
Google Publisher Tag outperforms Kilkaya in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 69). Kilkaya leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Google Publisher Tag when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kilkaya when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 355 audited Google Publisher Tag sites and 4 audited Kilkaya sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback