Skip to content

GOV.UK Frontend vs HTTP/3

Based on 1 and 44 real audits

View GOV.UK Frontend details | View HTTP/3 details
MetricGOV.UK FrontendHTTP/3Winner
Performance7737GOV.UK Frontend
Accessibility10091GOV.UK Frontend
Best Practices10087GOV.UK Frontend
SEO10092GOV.UK Frontend
Security8466GOV.UK Frontend
TTFB1133ms351msHTTP/3
Composite8874GOV.UK Frontend
Performance
GOV.UK Frontend
77
HTTP/3
37
Accessibility
GOV.UK Frontend
100
HTTP/3
91
Security
GOV.UK Frontend
84
HTTP/3
66
SEO
GOV.UK Frontend
100
HTTP/3
92
Composite
GOV.UK Frontend
88
HTTP/3
74

GOV.UK Frontend outperforms HTTP/3 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (88 vs 74). HTTP/3 leads in TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, GOV.UK Frontend or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, GOV.UK Frontend sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (77 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, GOV.UK Frontend or HTTP/3?
GOV.UK Frontend sites score higher on security analysis (84 vs 66 on average).
Should I choose GOV.UK Frontend or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. GOV.UK Frontend scores higher on performance while GOV.UK Frontend may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback