Based on 13 and 3415 real audits
| Metric | GOV.UK Frontend | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 75 | 45 | GOV.UK Frontend |
| Accessibility | 99 | 89 | GOV.UK Frontend |
| Best Practices | 100 | 87 | GOV.UK Frontend |
| SEO | 98 | 92 | GOV.UK Frontend |
| Security | 78 | 66 | GOV.UK Frontend |
| TTFB | 216ms | 365ms | GOV.UK Frontend |
| Composite | 84 | 74 | GOV.UK Frontend |
GOV.UK Frontend outperforms Open Graph in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 74). Open Graph leads in no categories.
Choose GOV.UK Frontend when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Open Graph doesn't clearly lead GOV.UK Frontend in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 13 audited GOV.UK Frontend sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback