Skip to content

GOV.UK Frontend vs Ruby on Rails

Based on 1 and 4 real audits

View GOV.UK Frontend details | View Ruby on Rails details
MetricGOV.UK FrontendRuby on RailsWinner
Performance7749GOV.UK Frontend
Accessibility10089GOV.UK Frontend
Best Practices10093GOV.UK Frontend
SEO10098GOV.UK Frontend
Security8475GOV.UK Frontend
TTFB1133ms547msRuby on Rails
Composite8879GOV.UK Frontend
Performance
GOV.UK Frontend
77
Ruby on Rails
49
Accessibility
GOV.UK Frontend
100
Ruby on Rails
89
Security
GOV.UK Frontend
84
Ruby on Rails
75
SEO
GOV.UK Frontend
100
Ruby on Rails
98
Composite
GOV.UK Frontend
88
Ruby on Rails
79

GOV.UK Frontend outperforms Ruby on Rails in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (88 vs 79). Ruby on Rails leads in TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, GOV.UK Frontend or Ruby on Rails?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, GOV.UK Frontend sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (77 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, GOV.UK Frontend or Ruby on Rails?
GOV.UK Frontend sites score higher on security analysis (84 vs 75 on average).
Should I choose GOV.UK Frontend or Ruby on Rails for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. GOV.UK Frontend scores higher on performance while GOV.UK Frontend may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback