Skip to content

GOV.UK Toolkit vs Ruby

Based on 1 and 5 real audits

View GOV.UK Toolkit details | View Ruby details
MetricGOV.UK ToolkitRubyWinner
Performance7757GOV.UK Toolkit
Accessibility10090GOV.UK Toolkit
Best Practices10094GOV.UK Toolkit
SEO10098GOV.UK Toolkit
Security8471GOV.UK Toolkit
TTFB1133ms463msRuby
Composite8879GOV.UK Toolkit
Performance
GOV.UK Toolkit
77
Ruby
57
Accessibility
GOV.UK Toolkit
100
Ruby
90
Security
GOV.UK Toolkit
84
Ruby
71
SEO
GOV.UK Toolkit
100
Ruby
98
Composite
GOV.UK Toolkit
88
Ruby
79

GOV.UK Toolkit outperforms Ruby in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (88 vs 79). Ruby leads in TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, GOV.UK Toolkit or Ruby?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, GOV.UK Toolkit sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (77 vs 57 on average).
Which has better security, GOV.UK Toolkit or Ruby?
GOV.UK Toolkit sites score higher on security analysis (84 vs 71 on average).
Should I choose GOV.UK Toolkit or Ruby for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. GOV.UK Toolkit scores higher on performance while GOV.UK Toolkit may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback