Skip to content

HSTS vs Infogram

Based on 2599 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Infogram details
MetricHSTSInfogramWinner
Performance4836HSTS
Accessibility8994Infogram
Best Practices8877HSTS
SEO9192Infogram
Security7065HSTS
TTFB365ms336msInfogram
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Infogram
36
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Infogram
94
Security
HSTS
70
Infogram
65
SEO
HSTS
91
Infogram
92
Composite
HSTS
75
Infogram
73

HSTS outperforms Infogram in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Infogram leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Infogram

Choose Infogram when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2599 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Infogram sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Infogram?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Infogram?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Infogram?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Infogram (94 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Infogram?
Infogram sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Infogram?
Infogram sites show lower Time to First Byte (336 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Infogram for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback