Skip to content

Infogram

Based on 1 real audits

36
Avg. Performance
94
Avg. Accessibility
77
Avg. Best Practices
92
Avg. SEO
65
Avg. Security
73
Avg. Composite
36 /100
Avg. Performance
336 ms
Avg. TTFB
73 /100
Avg. Composite
1
Sites Audited

How Infogram sites compare

Infogram sites tend to score below average on performance (36/100), compared to the global average of 46/100.

Recent Audits

SitePerformanceGradeAudited
nrf.com36C2026-04-22

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Infogram also commonly use:

BrightEdge SEO 1Google Search Console Analytics 1HSTS Security 1Insider Customer data platform 1Lodash JavaScript libraries 1Microsoft Analytics 1Netlify PaaS 1Netlify CDN CDN 1Next.js JavaScript frameworks 1Next.js App Router JavaScript frameworks 1

Compare with...

Infogram vs BrightEdgeInfogram vs Google Search ConsoleInfogram vs HSTSInfogram vs InsiderInfogram vs LodashInfogram vs MicrosoftInfogram vs NetlifyInfogram vs Netlify CDNInfogram vs Next.jsInfogram vs Next.js App Router

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Infogram sites?
Based on 1 real audits, Infogram sites score an average of 36/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Infogram compare on web security?
Infogram sites score an average security grade of 65/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Infogram websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Infogram sites is 336ms based on 1 audits.
How can I improve my Infogram site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Infogram site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Infogram site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback