Skip to content

Infogram vs Microsoft

Based on 1 and 2444 real audits

View Infogram details | View Microsoft details
MetricInfogramMicrosoftWinner
Performance3639Microsoft
Accessibility9489Infogram
Best Practices7786Microsoft
SEO9289Infogram
Security6567Microsoft
TTFB336ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Infogram
36
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Infogram
94
Microsoft
89
Security
Infogram
65
Microsoft
67
SEO
Infogram
92
Microsoft
89
Composite
Infogram
73
Microsoft
73

Microsoft outperforms Infogram in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Infogram leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Infogram

Choose Infogram when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Infogram sites and 2444 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Infogram or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Infogram or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Infogram or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Infogram (94 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Infogram or Microsoft?
Infogram sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Infogram or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 336 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Infogram or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Infogram may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback