Skip to content

PDF.js vs web-vitals

Based on 2 and 107 real audits

View PDF.js details | View web-vitals details
MetricPDF.jsweb-vitalsWinner
Performance2436web-vitals
Accessibility9490PDF.js
Best Practices7985web-vitals
SEO9290PDF.js
Security6565Tie
TTFB230ms358msPDF.js
Composite7273web-vitals
Performance
PDF.js
24
web-vitals
36
Accessibility
PDF.js
94
web-vitals
90
Security
PDF.js
65
web-vitals
65
SEO
PDF.js
92
web-vitals
90
Composite
PDF.js
72
web-vitals
73

PDF.js and web-vitals are closely matched, each leading in different categories. PDF.js has a composite score of 72 while web-vitals scores 73.

FAQ

Which is faster, PDF.js or web-vitals?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, web-vitals sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, PDF.js or web-vitals?
PDF.js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Should I choose PDF.js or web-vitals for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. web-vitals scores higher on performance while PDF.js may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback