web-vitals Performance Audit

37 /100

Avg. Performance

415 ms

Avg. TTFB

73 /100

Avg. Composite

157

Sites Audited

How web-vitals sites compare

web-vitals sites tend to score below average on performance (37/100), compared to the global average of 60/100.

Recent Audits

View adoption trends → See all 146 websites using web-vitals →

Site	Performance	Grade	Audited
cpsc.gov	37	B	2026-10-13
wired.com	30	C	2026-09-27
www.daraz.com.bd/#?	34	C	2026-09-25
lantian.pub	85	B	2026-07-24
nsa.gov	52	C	2026-07-10
bea.gov	44	B	2026-06-23
va.gov	46	B	2026-05-10
doctissimo.fr	50	C	2026-04-22
empireonline.com	44	C	2026-04-22
kantar.com	36	D	2026-04-22

Commonly Used With

Sites that use web-vitals also commonly use:

Google Tag Manager Tag managers 133 Open Graph Miscellaneous 133 Google Analytics Analytics 119 Google Search Console Analytics 113 jQuery JavaScript libraries 97 Microsoft Analytics 96 HSTS Security 92 core-js JavaScript libraries 77 PHP Programming languages 72 Priority Hints Performance 54

Compare with...

web-vitals vs Google Tag Manager web-vitals vs Open Graph web-vitals vs Google Analytics web-vitals vs Google Search Console web-vitals vs jQuery web-vitals vs Microsoft web-vitals vs HSTS web-vitals vs core-js web-vitals vs PHP web-vitals vs Priority Hints

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for web-vitals sites?

Based on 157 real audits, web-vitals sites score an average of 37/100 on Lighthouse performance.

How does web-vitals compare on web security?

web-vitals sites score an average security grade of 66/100 in BeaverCheck audits.

What is the average page load time for web-vitals websites?

The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for web-vitals sites is 415ms based on 157 audits.

How can I improve my web-vitals site's performance?

Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your web-vitals site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your web-vitals site now

Run Audit