Skip to content
https://Lovemedia.nz

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.95g CO2 per view
FIX
0.95g CO2 per view
Info::
0.95g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.95g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.18g, network 0.16g, end-user device 0.61g.
Got: 0.95g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 114.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 114.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 14312 smartphones.

0.95g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 40% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.4 MB

Your site
0.95g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.18g
Network
0.16g
End-user device
0.61g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 9.5 kg · Annual: 114.5 kg · ≈ 14312 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
60th percentile
FIX
60th percentile
Warning::
0.95g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 40% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 60th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.95g

60th percentile

Cleaner than 40% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 59% more
vs Target 91% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
66% efficient
REVIEW
66% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 66%
An estimated 1186 KB (34%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1186 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.33g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
66% efficient

Total waste: 1186 KB (34% of page weight)

Unused JS 1186 KB

0.33g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3450 KB
Theoretical minimum 2263 KB
Potential savings 1186 KB (0.33g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 63 KB (vs 3450 KB first visit). 98 of 101 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.94g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.95g)
First visit
3450 KB
Repeat visit
63 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.94g CO2 per returning visitor

98 resources served from cache · 3 resources re-downloaded

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
1 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
16 images, 166 KB total, 26 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

16

Total Size

166 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

26 KB

10 missing alt text 3 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback