Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 6539ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (3264ms), slowest from Madrid (9832ms). No CDN detected. 6 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
No DMARC record found
Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.
No Permissions-Policy header
Permissions-Policy locks down browser APIs you don't use, shrinking the attack surface.
Permissions-Policy header is missing
Permissions-Policy locks down browser APIs you don't use — without it, every page can request camera/mic/geolocation if XSS lands.
X-Frame-Options header is missing
Without frame protection, your site can be embedded in a hostile page and used for clickjacking.
form-action directive is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€184 investment → €6,106/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.
- Page takes 5.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 2.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120,500,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerGDPR: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerGDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
- 1 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€4,547 /mo
+20.7pp bounce · ~2,067 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0.18 /mo
2488.6 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~249 KB per page loadSaves €0.18/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.73 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
5.06 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
6 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.38 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.11 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
344 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
942 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.013
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
655 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
945 ms
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
No DMARC record found
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
HSTS, on Elixir, hosted on Fly.io
Stack Architecture
Open Graph 
Phoenix Framework Phoenix LiveView 
Priority Hints 
Tailwind CSS 
Elixir 
Erlang 
Fly.io All Detected Technologies (9)
Fly is a platform for running full stack apps and databases.
Elixir is a dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications.
Erlang is a general-purpose, concurrent, functional programming language, and a garbage-collected runtime system.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Phoenix Framework is an open-source web application framework built using the Elixir programming language.
Phoenix LiveView is a library that brings live, interactive, real-time user experiences to your Phoenix applications.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/1b8b7f20-0bb2-4133-900a-e5d785da18eb)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/1b8b7f20-0bb2-4133-900a-e5d785da18eb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpotentialspouse.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpotentialspouse.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 2h total → projected A (91)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · X-Frame-Options header is missing
- · No Permissions-Policy header
- · Permissions-Policy header is missing
- · form-action directive is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · No DMARC record found