https://www.acethehimalaya.com
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
64
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
82 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
FCO2 Per Page LoadAction2.40g CO2 per viewFIX
CO2 Per Page Load
Action2.40g CO2 per view
2.40g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.40g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 8.5 MB, producing an estimated 2.40g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.45g, network 0.42g, end-user device 1.54g.
Got: 2.40g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 288.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 288.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 36056 smartphones.
2.40g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 5% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 8.5 MB
Your site
2.40g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.45g
Network
0.42g
End-user device
1.54g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 24.0 kg · Annual: 288.5 kg · ≈ 36056 smartphone charges
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
FCarbon BudgetAction95th percentileFIX
Carbon Budget
Action95th percentile
95th percentile
Warning::
2.40g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
2.40g
95th percentile
Cleaner than 5% of websites
✗ Above the median website
vs Median 301% more
vs Target 381% more
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Repeat Visit Weight97% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 226 KB (vs 8691 KB first visit). 141 of 142 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.34g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.06g CO2 (first visit: 2.40g)
First visit
8691 KB
Repeat visit
226 KB
97% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 2.34g CO2 per returning visitor
141 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency97% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 299 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 299 KB (3% of page weight)
Unused JS 299 KB
0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 8691 KB
Theoretical minimum 8391 KB
Potential savings 299 KB (0.08g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
Image Optimization200 images, 4194 KB total, 1415 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
200 images, 4194 KB total, 1415 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
200
Total Size
4194 KB
Oversized
28
Wasted
1415 KB
1 missing alt text 136 missing dimensions 30 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.