https://лимаркет.рф
Sustainability
· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
62 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BCO2 Per Page Load0.50g CO2 per viewREVIEW
CO2 Per Page Load
0.50g CO2 per view
0.50g CO2 per view
Info::
0.50g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.8 MB, producing an estimated 0.50g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.09g, end-user device 0.32g.
Got: 0.50g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 60.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 60.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 7557 smartphones.
0.50g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 60% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.8 MB
Your site
0.50g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.09g
Network
0.09g
End-user device
0.32g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.0 kg · Annual: 60.5 kg · ≈ 7557 smartphone charges
BCarbon Budget40th percentileREVIEW
Carbon Budget
40th percentile
40th percentile
Info::
0.50g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 60% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 40th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.50g
40th percentile
Cleaner than 60% of websites
✗ Above the median website
vs Median 16% cleaner ✓
vs Target 1% more
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Repeat Visit Weight100% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 7 KB (vs 1821 KB first visit). 16 of 17 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.50g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.50g)
First visit
1821 KB
Repeat visit
7 KB
100% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.50g CO2 per returning visitor
16 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency96% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
96% efficient
96% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 96%
Only 65 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 65 KB (4% of page weight)
Unused JS 65 KB
0.02g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1821 KB
Theoretical minimum 1755 KB
Potential savings 65 KB (0.02g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.