Skip to content
https://baltimoresun.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
54
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
23.01g CO2 per view
FIX
23.01g CO2 per view
Critical::
23.01g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 81.2 MB, producing an estimated 23.01g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 4.26g, network 3.98g, end-user device 14.77g.
Got: 23.01g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 2760.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 2760.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 345080 smartphones.

23.01g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 81.2 MB

Your site
23.01g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
4.26g
Network
3.98g
End-user device
14.77g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 230.1 kg · Annual: 2760.6 kg · ≈ 345080 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Snowplow AnalyticsCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
23.01g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

23.01g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 3734% more
vs Target 4501% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 674 KB (vs 83183 KB first visit). 1868 of 2062 resources are served from browser cache, saving 22.82g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.19g CO2 (first visit: 23.01g)
First visit
83183 KB
Repeat visit
674 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 22.82g CO2 per returning visitor

1868 resources served from cache · 194 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
96% efficient
PASS
96% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 96%
Only 2996 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
96% efficient

Total waste: 2996 KB (4% of page weight)

Unused JS 2996 KB

0.83g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 83183 KB
Theoretical minimum 80186 KB
Potential savings 2996 KB (0.83g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback