Skip to content
https://stripe.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
33
TTFB degrading ↓
534ms
FCP stable →
3.3s
LCP stable →
8.1s
Scanned
2026-05-10 09:43 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
2.9m
Vs prev
Improved by +1

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 238ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (45ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (508ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
45ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 12ms
United States - Santa Clara
132ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 34ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
235ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 29ms
Spain - Madrid
296ms
DNS 27ms · TLS 41ms
Singapore - Singapore
209ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 5ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
508ms
DNS 40ms · TLS 125ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 238ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

28 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 2

163 third-party resources (93% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 3

170 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 4

175 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
Warning: 5

6 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 9.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 3 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 9.4s — fixing the 3 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$850 investment → $6,929/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$850
8.5 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
$6,929
$83,146/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9682% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$8500.1 mo payback · +9682% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
5
3 crit 2 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
64
C
Speed
2
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
3
  • Page takes 9.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 89.5s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • 29 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
    Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
    → Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$850 8.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$50 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$16,319 / month at risk ~$195,834 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 1 tracking cookie(s) set before consent interaction
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Multiple H1 headings (2 found)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 empty heading(s)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,194 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$0.60 /mo

7498.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~750 KB per page load
    Saves $0.60/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

32
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.75 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.39 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

89.51 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.66 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

120.67 s

Desktop

51
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

833 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.99 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

23.11 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.009

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.70 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

34.17 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 535 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Accessibility P93Compliance P9SEO P83Performance P82Infrastructure P80Sustainability P66Content P42

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
WooCommerce · 105 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 92% of WooCommerce sites See full WooCommerce benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Amazon S3 CDN

21 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality WooCommerce
Framework
Amazon Route 53 Apple Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft Open Graph Priority Hints React Sentry Three.js 178 Webpack core-js 3.6.5 dc.js
CDN
Amazon S3 Nginx
Hosting
Amazon Web Services Next.js 14.2.30

All Detected Technologies (21)

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://b.stripecdn.com/mkt-ssr-statics/assets/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Ecommerce Website https://woocommerce.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Body: woocommerce class/marker present
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-1087.awsdns-07.org
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=8kIS0gmJTvILWQuI
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=m7id9rt8ehlgcg9tt2yggbsi6gro7i
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=NLkFgZLHeVMVYlR3t1UZC9_1LzmqCAefJyNDs6ZQqBA
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms80697640

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Three.js is a cross-browser JavaScript library and application programming interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser using WebGL.

Categories JavaScript graphics Website https://threejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

A multi-dimensional charting library built to work natively with crossfilter and rendered using d3.js

Categories JavaScript graphics, JavaScript libraries Website https://dc-js.github.io/dc.js/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstripe.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/3883dc5a-02e9-4863-8267-108931a5cf06)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3883dc5a-02e9-4863-8267-108931a5cf06"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstripe.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstripe.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · 28 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 163 third-party resources (93% of weight)
  • · 6 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 8h → B (87)
  • · 170 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
  • · 175 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback