Skip to content
https://stripe.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
75
GRADE
C
FIX
2
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 2 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web ServicesCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
52th percentile
FIX
52th percentile
Warning::
0.68g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 48% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 52th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.68g

52nd percentile

Cleaner than 48% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 13% more
vs Target 35% more
B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.68g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.68g CO2 per view
Info::
0.68g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.68g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.13g, network 0.12g, end-user device 0.43g.
Got: 0.68g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 81.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 81.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 10125 smartphones.

0.68g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 48% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.4 MB

Your site
0.68g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.13g
Network
0.12g
End-user device
0.43g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 6.8 kg · Annual: 81.0 kg · ≈ 10125 smartphone charges
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
93% cached
PASS
93% cached
Info::
93% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 167 KB (vs 2440 KB first visit). 166 of 170 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.63g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.05g CO2 (first visit: 0.68g)
First visit
2440 KB
Repeat visit
167 KB

93% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.63g CO2 per returning visitor

166 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
91% efficient
PASS
91% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 91%
Only 219 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
91% efficient

Total waste: 219 KB (9% of page weight)

Unused JS 219 KB

0.06g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2440 KB
Theoretical minimum 2221 KB
Potential savings 219 KB (0.06g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
46 images, 0 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

46

Total Size

0 KB

Oversized

4

38 missing alt text 2 missing dimensions
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback