Skip to content
https://abril.com.br

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.92g CO2 per view
FIX
0.92g CO2 per view
Info::
0.92g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.2 MB, producing an estimated 0.92g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.17g, network 0.16g, end-user device 0.59g.
Got: 0.92g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 110.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 110.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 13763 smartphones.

0.92g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 41% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.2 MB

Your site
0.92g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.17g
Network
0.16g
End-user device
0.59g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 9.2 kg · Annual: 110.1 kg · ≈ 13763 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Railway: No public renewable energy commitment
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting RailwayCDN Not identified

Railway: No public renewable energy commitment

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
59th percentile
FIX
59th percentile
Warning::
0.92g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 41% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 59th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.92g

59th percentile

Cleaner than 41% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 53% more
vs Target 84% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
80% efficient
REVIEW
80% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 80%
An estimated 650 KB (20%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 650 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.18g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
80% efficient

Total waste: 650 KB (20% of page weight)

Unused JS 650 KB

0.18g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3317 KB
Theoretical minimum 2666 KB
Potential savings 650 KB (0.18g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 22 KB (vs 3317 KB first visit). 76 of 77 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.91g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.92g)
First visit
3317 KB
Repeat visit
22 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.91g CO2 per returning visitor

76 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback