Skip to content
https://master-220v.ru

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
2
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 2 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
52th percentile
FIX
52th percentile
Warning::
0.67g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 48% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 52th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.67g

52nd percentile

Cleaner than 48% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 12% more
vs Target 35% more
B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.67g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.67g CO2 per view
Info::
0.67g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.67g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.12g, network 0.12g, end-user device 0.43g.
Got: 0.67g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 80.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 80.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 10097 smartphones.

0.67g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 48% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.4 MB

Your site
0.67g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.12g
Network
0.12g
End-user device
0.43g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 6.7 kg · Annual: 80.8 kg · ≈ 10097 smartphone charges
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 15 KB (vs 2433 KB first visit). 69 of 71 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.67g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.67g)
First visit
2433 KB
Repeat visit
15 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.67g CO2 per returning visitor

69 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
93% efficient
PASS
93% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 93%
Only 178 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
93% efficient

Total waste: 178 KB (7% of page weight)

Unused JS 178 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2433 KB
Theoretical minimum 2255 KB
Potential savings 178 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
1 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
46 images, 2050 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

46

Total Size

2050 KB

1 missing dimensions 40 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback