https://www.eurovoyages.net
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionNot greenFIX
Green Hosting
ActionNot green
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting GoDaddy✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BTransfer Efficiency83% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
83% efficient
83% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 83%
An estimated 158 KB (17%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 158 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.04g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 158 KB (17% of page weight)
Unused JS 158 KB
0.04g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 937 KB
Theoretical minimum 779 KB
Potential savings 158 KB (0.04g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.26g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.26g CO2 per view
0.26g CO2 per view
Info::
0.26g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.26g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.04g, end-user device 0.17g.
Got: 0.26g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 31.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 31.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 3889 smartphones.
0.26g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 85% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.9 MB
Your site
0.26g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.05g
Network
0.04g
End-user device
0.17g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.6 kg · Annual: 31.1 kg · ≈ 3889 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight96% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 36 KB (vs 937 KB first visit). 78 of 79 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.25g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.26g)
First visit
937 KB
Repeat visit
36 KB
96% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.25g CO2 per returning visitor
78 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
ACarbon Budget15th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
15th percentile
15th percentile
Info::
0.26g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 85% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 15th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.26g
15th percentile
Cleaner than 85% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 57% cleaner ✓
vs Target 48% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization38 images, 248 KB total, 189 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
38 images, 248 KB total, 189 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
38
Total Size
248 KB
Oversized
11
Wasted
189 KB
31 missing dimensions 37 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.