Skip to content
https://intechopen.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
54
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
8.22g CO2 per view
FIX
8.22g CO2 per view
Critical::
8.22g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 29.0 MB, producing an estimated 8.22g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 1.52g, network 1.42g, end-user device 5.28g.
Got: 8.22g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 986.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 986.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 123345 smartphones.

8.22g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 29.0 MB

Your site
8.22g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
1.52g
Network
1.42g
End-user device
5.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 82.2 kg · Annual: 986.8 kg · ≈ 123345 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web Services✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
8.22g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

8.22g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 1271% more
vs Target 1545% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 181 KB (vs 29733 KB first visit). 167 of 169 resources are served from browser cache, saving 8.17g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.05g CO2 (first visit: 8.22g)
First visit
29733 KB
Repeat visit
181 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 8.17g CO2 per returning visitor

167 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
99% efficient
PASS
99% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 99%
Only 254 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
99% efficient

Total waste: 254 KB (1% of page weight)

Unused JS 254 KB

0.07g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 29733 KB
Theoretical minimum 29478 KB
Potential savings 254 KB (0.07g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback