https://icetrayweedclub.com
Sustainability
· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
79
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Checks
63 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionNot greenFIX
Green Hosting
ActionNot green
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting GoDaddy✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BCarbon Budget33th percentileREVIEW
Carbon Budget
33th percentile
33th percentile
Info::
0.44g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 67% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 33th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.44g
33rd percentile
Cleaner than 67% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 27% cleaner ✓
vs Target 13% cleaner ✓
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.44g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.44g CO2 per view
0.44g CO2 per view
Info::
0.44g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.44g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.28g.
Got: 0.44g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 52.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 52.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6561 smartphones.
0.44g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 67% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.5 MB
Your site
0.44g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.08g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.4 kg · Annual: 52.5 kg · ≈ 6561 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight96% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 65 KB (vs 1581 KB first visit). 98 of 99 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.42g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.44g)
First visit
1581 KB
Repeat visit
65 KB
96% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.42g CO2 per returning visitor
98 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency99% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
99% efficient
99% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 99%
Only 21 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 21 KB (1% of page weight)
Unused JS 21 KB
0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1581 KB
Theoretical minimum 1559 KB
Potential savings 21 KB (0.01g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.