Skip to content
https://cirquedusoleil.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
57
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
2.24g CO2 per view
FIX
2.24g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.24g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 7.9 MB, producing an estimated 2.24g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.41g, network 0.39g, end-user device 1.44g.
Got: 2.24g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 268.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 268.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 33538 smartphones.

2.24g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 7.9 MB

Your site
2.24g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.41g
Network
0.39g
End-user device
1.44g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 22.4 kg · Annual: 268.3 kg · ≈ 33538 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Azure: Microsoft is carbon-negative; Azure renewable varies by region
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Azure✗CDN Not identified✗

Azure: Microsoft is carbon-negative; Azure renewable varies by region

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
2.24g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

2.24g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 273% more
vs Target 347% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 40 KB (vs 8084 KB first visit). 160 of 167 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.22g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 2.24g)
First visit
8084 KB
Repeat visit
40 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.22g CO2 per returning visitor

160 resources served from cache · 7 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
93% efficient
PASS
93% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 93%
Only 598 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
93% efficient

Total waste: 598 KB (7% of page weight)

Unused JS 598 KB

0.17g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 8084 KB
Theoretical minimum 7485 KB
Potential savings 598 KB (0.17g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback