Audit overview
Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
2 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
2 image-only link(s) without alt text
Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
43 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
£338 investment → £9,838/month returns + GBP 18,050,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.
- Page takes 14.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 11.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.3sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 3 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
£18,050,000
- No privacy policy link detectedUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPECR: GBP 1,000 – GBP 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
£9,838 /mo
+32.8pp bounce · ~3,279 lost visitors/mo
CPC: GBP 3.00
Bandwidth Waste
£0.36 /mo
5662.1 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~566 KB per page loadSaves £0.36/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.16 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
13.95 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.26 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.119
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.16 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.00 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.03 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.86 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
107 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.116
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.80 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.86 s
Categories
8Performance
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Security
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
2 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Amazon Route 53
Stack Architecture
All Detected Technologies (21)
Chart.js is an open-source JavaScript library that allows you to draw different types of charts by using the HTML5 canvas element.
Consent Manager is a provider ensuring GDPR and CCPA compliance for websites.
Flickity is a JavaScript slider library, built by David DeSandro of Metafizzy fame.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
LazySizes is a JavaScript library used to delay the loading of images (iframes, scripts, etc) until they come into view.
Onsen UI is an open-source HTML5 hybrid app framework offering mobile UI components for PhoneGap and Cordova development.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
reCAPTCHA is a free service from Google that helps protect websites from spam and abuse.
Cabin is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
SpeedCurve is a front-end performance monitoring service.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/9af3ef39-9bcb-46ff-8846-d512c2a8f251)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/9af3ef39-9bcb-46ff-8846-d512c2a8f251"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flrb.co.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flrb.co.ukFix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (83)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 2 image-only link(s) without alt text
- · 43 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 2 control(s) without accessible label
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
- · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift


