Skip to content
https://igvita.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
4
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 4 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting GoDaddy✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.60g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.60g CO2 per view
Info::
0.60g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.1 MB, producing an estimated 0.60g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.11g, network 0.10g, end-user device 0.38g.
Got: 0.60g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 71.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 71.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8979 smartphones.

0.60g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 51% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.1 MB

Your site
0.60g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.11g
Network
0.10g
End-user device
0.38g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 6.0 kg · Annual: 71.8 kg · ≈ 8979 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
49th percentile
REVIEW
49th percentile
Info::
0.60g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 51% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 49th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.60g

49th percentile

Cleaner than 51% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 0% cleaner ✓
vs Target 20% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
89% efficient
REVIEW
89% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 89%
An estimated 239 KB (11%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 239 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.07g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
89% efficient

Total waste: 239 KB (11% of page weight)

Unused JS 239 KB

0.07g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2164 KB
Theoretical minimum 1924 KB
Potential savings 239 KB (0.07g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 19 KB (vs 2164 KB first visit). 27 of 28 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.59g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.60g)
First visit
2164 KB
Repeat visit
19 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.59g CO2 per returning visitor

27 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback