Skip to content
https://pew.org

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
72
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
4
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 4 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Microsoft IIS✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.57g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.57g CO2 per view
Info::
0.57g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.57g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.10g, network 0.10g, end-user device 0.36g.
Got: 0.57g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 68.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 68.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8499 smartphones.

0.57g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 54% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.0 MB

Your site
0.57g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.10g
Network
0.10g
End-user device
0.36g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.7 kg · Annual: 68.0 kg · ≈ 8499 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
46th percentile
REVIEW
46th percentile
Info::
0.57g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 54% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 46th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.57g

46th percentile

Cleaner than 54% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 6% cleaner ✓
vs Target 13% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
86% efficient
REVIEW
86% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 86%
An estimated 282 KB (14%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 282 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.08g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
86% efficient

Total waste: 282 KB (14% of page weight)

Unused JS 282 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2048 KB
Theoretical minimum 1766 KB
Potential savings 282 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 53 KB (vs 2048 KB first visit). 75 of 76 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.55g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.57g)
First visit
2048 KB
Repeat visit
53 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.55g CO2 per returning visitor

75 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback