Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.

SCORE

GRADE

FIX

REVIEW

PASS

INFO

Device:

Mobile Desktop

Checks

2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX

CO2 Per Page Load

Action

2.09g CO2 per view

FIX

2.09g CO2 per view

2.09g CO2 per page view

This page transfers 7.4 MB, producing an estimated 2.09g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.39g, network 0.36g, end-user device 1.34g.

Got: 2.09g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)

At 10,000 monthly views: 251.1 kg CO2/year

With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 251.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 31387 smartphones.

2.09g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 7.4 MB

Your site

2.09g

Top 10%

0.20g

Target

0.50g

Median website

0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center

0.39g

Network

0.36g

End-user device

1.34g

At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 20.9 kg · Annual: 251.1 kg · ≈ 31387 smartphone charges

Green Hosting

Action

Not green

FIX

Not green

No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected

Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.

Green hosting status based on known provider commitments

Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.

Green HostingNot Green Hosted

Hosting Microsoft IIS✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

Carbon Budget

Action

95th percentile

FIX

95th percentile

2.09g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)

Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.

Estimated 95th percentile

Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.

Top 10%

Target

Median website

2.09g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 249% more

vs Target 319% more

Web Font Weight Variants

6 font weights loaded across 3 famil(y/ies)

REVIEW

6 font weights loaded across 3 famil(y/ies)

6 font weights loaded -- review whether all are used

5+ weights for a single page is often more than needed. Compare against the actual font-weight CSS rules in your stylesheets; trim weights that aren't applied to any element. Affected families: Bebas Neue, DM Sans, Space Mono.

Green Hosting

Action

Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure

REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+

Repeat Visit Weight

100% cached

PASS

100% cached

100% reduction on repeat visits

Returning visitors download only 2 KB (vs 7566 KB first visit). 13 of 14 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.09g CO2 per repeat visit.

Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 2.09g)

First visit

7566 KB

Repeat visit

2 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.09g CO2 per returning visitor

13 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+

Transfer Efficiency

100% efficient

PASS

100% efficient

Transfer efficiency: 100%

Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.

Actual transfer 7566 KB

Theoretical minimum 7566 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization

4 images, 9067 KB total, 4808 KB wasted

INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

Total Size

9067 KB

Oversized

Wasted

4808 KB

4 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.