Skip to content
https://zadelrf.ru

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
62
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
2.67g CO2 per view
FIX
2.67g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.67g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 9.4 MB, producing an estimated 2.67g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.49g, network 0.46g, end-user device 1.71g.
Got: 2.67g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 320.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 320.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 40039 smartphones.

2.67g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 9.4 MB

Your site
2.67g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.49g
Network
0.46g
End-user device
1.71g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 26.7 kg · Annual: 320.3 kg · ≈ 40039 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
2.67g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

2.67g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 345% more
vs Target 434% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
90% efficient
REVIEW
90% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 90%
An estimated 980 KB (10%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 980 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.27g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
90% efficient

Total waste: 980 KB (10% of page weight)

Unused JS 980 KB

0.27g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 9651 KB
Theoretical minimum 8671 KB
Potential savings 980 KB (0.27g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 59 KB (vs 9651 KB first visit). 197 of 198 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.65g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 2.67g)
First visit
9651 KB
Repeat visit
59 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.65g CO2 per returning visitor

197 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
1 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
78 images, 0 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

78

Total Size

0 KB

Oversized

39

61 missing dimensions 34 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback