Skip to content
https://billboard.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
53
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
2.79g CO2 per view
FIX
2.79g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.79g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 9.9 MB, producing an estimated 2.79g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.52g, network 0.48g, end-user device 1.79g.
Got: 2.79g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 335.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 335.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 41870 smartphones.

2.79g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 9.9 MB

Your site
2.79g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.52g
Network
0.48g
End-user device
1.79g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 27.9 kg · Annual: 335.0 kg · ≈ 41870 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web Services✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
2.79g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

2.79g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 365% more
vs Target 458% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
89% efficient
REVIEW
89% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 89%
An estimated 1093 KB (11%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1093 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.30g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
89% efficient

Total waste: 1093 KB (11% of page weight)

Unused JS 1093 KB

0.30g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 10093 KB
Theoretical minimum 8999 KB
Potential savings 1093 KB (0.30g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
94% cached
PASS
94% cached
Info::
94% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 575 KB (vs 10093 KB first visit). 392 of 408 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.63g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.16g CO2 (first visit: 2.79g)
First visit
10093 KB
Repeat visit
575 KB

94% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.63g CO2 per returning visitor

392 resources served from cache · 16 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback