https://feshionz.com/?srsltid=AfmBOoqZppqG1g1ffxbM8Rz7vF8ViCHeqH8cVZbTB2kdtgWCxSFHYr7d

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.

SCORE

GRADE

FIX

REVIEW

PASS

INFO

Device:

Mobile Desktop

Checks

2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX

CO2 Per Page Load

Action

1.20g CO2 per view

FIX

1.20g CO2 per view

1.20g CO2 per page view

This page transfers 4.2 MB, producing an estimated 1.20g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.22g, network 0.21g, end-user device 0.77g.

Got: 1.20g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)

At 10,000 monthly views: 144.0 kg CO2/year

With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 144.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 18001 smartphones.

1.20g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 33% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.2 MB

Your site

1.20g

Top 10%

0.20g

Target

0.50g

Median website

0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center

0.22g

Network

0.21g

End-user device

0.77g

At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 12.0 kg · Annual: 144.0 kg · ≈ 18001 smartphone charges

Green Hosting

Action

Unknown

FIX

Unknown

Hosting provider could not be identified

Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.

Green hosting status based on known provider commitments

Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.

Green HostingUnable to Determine

Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

Carbon Budget

Action

67th percentile

FIX

67th percentile

1.20g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)

Heavier than an estimated 33% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.

Estimated 67th percentile

Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.

Top 10%

Target

Median website

1.20g

67th percentile

Cleaner than 33% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 100% more

vs Target 140% more

Transfer Efficiency

87% efficient

REVIEW

87% efficient

Transfer efficiency: 87%

An estimated 575 KB (13%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 575 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.16g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.

Total waste: 575 KB (13% of page weight)

Unused JS 575 KB

0.16g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4339 KB

Theoretical minimum 3763 KB

Potential savings 575 KB (0.16g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Green Hosting

Action

Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure

REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+

Repeat Visit Weight

98% cached

PASS

98% cached

98% reduction on repeat visits

Returning visitors download only 78 KB (vs 4339 KB first visit). 123 of 128 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.18g CO2 per repeat visit.

Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.20g)

First visit

4339 KB

Repeat visit

78 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.18g CO2 per returning visitor

123 resources served from cache · 5 resources re-downloaded

A+

Web Font Weight Variants

2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable

PASS

2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable

2 font weight(s) loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)

Image Optimization

19 images, 2679 KB total, 0 KB wasted

INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

Total Size

2679 KB

8 missing dimensions 4 missing lazy loading

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.