https://feshionz.com/?srsltid=AfmBOoqZppqG1g1ffxbM8Rz7vF8ViCHeqH8cVZbTB2kdtgWCxSFHYr7d

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.

SCORE

GRADE

FIX

REVIEW

PASS

INFO

Device:

Mobile Desktop

Checks

2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX

CO2 Per Page Load

Action

1.47g CO2 per view

FIX

1.47g CO2 per view

1.47g CO2 per page view

This page transfers 5.2 MB, producing an estimated 1.47g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.27g, network 0.25g, end-user device 0.94g.

Got: 1.47g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)

At 10,000 monthly views: 176.1 kg CO2/year

With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 176.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 22013 smartphones.

1.47g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 26% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 5.2 MB

Your site

1.47g

Top 10%

0.20g

Target

0.50g

Median website

0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center

0.27g

Network

0.25g

End-user device

0.94g

At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 14.7 kg · Annual: 176.1 kg · ≈ 22013 smartphone charges

Green Hosting

Action

Unknown

FIX

Unknown

Hosting provider could not be identified

Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.

Green hosting status based on known provider commitments

Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.

Green HostingUnable to Determine

Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

Carbon Budget

Action

74th percentile

FIX

74th percentile

1.47g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)

Heavier than an estimated 26% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.

Estimated 74th percentile

Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.

Top 10%

Target

Median website

1.47g

74th percentile

Cleaner than 26% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 145% more

vs Target 194% more

Transfer Efficiency

88% efficient

REVIEW

88% efficient

Transfer efficiency: 88%

An estimated 643 KB (12%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 643 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.18g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.

Total waste: 643 KB (12% of page weight)

Unused JS 643 KB

0.18g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 5306 KB

Theoretical minimum 4663 KB

Potential savings 643 KB (0.18g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Green Hosting

Action

Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure

REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+

Repeat Visit Weight

99% cached

PASS

99% cached

99% reduction on repeat visits

Returning visitors download only 77 KB (vs 5306 KB first visit). 128 of 133 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.45g CO2 per repeat visit.

Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.47g)

First visit

5306 KB

Repeat visit

77 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.45g CO2 per returning visitor

128 resources served from cache · 5 resources re-downloaded

A+

Web Font Weight Variants

2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable

PASS

2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable

2 font weight(s) loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)

Image Optimization

19 images, 2679 KB total, 0 KB wasted

INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

Total Size

2679 KB

8 missing dimensions 4 missing lazy loading

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.