Skip to content
https://quantamagazine.org

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
56
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
2.57g CO2 per view
FIX
2.57g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.57g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 9.1 MB, producing an estimated 2.57g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.48g, network 0.44g, end-user device 1.65g.
Got: 2.57g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 308.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 308.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 38539 smartphones.

2.57g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 9.1 MB

Your site
2.57g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.48g
Network
0.44g
End-user device
1.65g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 25.7 kg · Annual: 308.3 kg · ≈ 38539 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
2.57g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

2.57g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 328% more
vs Target 414% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 44 KB (vs 9290 KB first visit). 80 of 81 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.56g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 2.57g)
First visit
9290 KB
Repeat visit
44 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.56g CO2 per returning visitor

80 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
98% efficient
PASS
98% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 98%
Only 164 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
98% efficient

Total waste: 164 KB (2% of page weight)

Unused JS 164 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 9290 KB
Theoretical minimum 9126 KB
Potential savings 164 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback