Accessibility
· 13 checks — Landmarks, headings, alt text, forms, and link quality rolled into one auditable list.FHeading HierarchyAction536 headings, 101 skip(s)FIX
- H1 The Sydney Morning Herald
- H2 The Sydney Morning Herald
- H4 Premium skipped
- H4 More
- H3 Good Food - What’s for Dinner
- H3 The Morning Edition podcast
- H3 Mini Crossword
- H5 Live skipped
- H5 Middle East at war
- H3 Vance’s trip to Pakistan for peace talks ‘on hold’; Iran yet to decide on attending
- H3 Latest live posts
- H3 Two Israeli soldiers punished after destroying Jesus statue in Lebanon
- H3 Witkoff, Kushner arrive at White House
- H3 US military boards Iran-linked oil tanker in Indian Ocean
- H3 Vance, Rubio still meeting with Trump at White House, says US official
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 AUKUS
- H3 Australia’s depending on AUKUS Virginia-class subs. The US says they’re not its priority
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H5 Opinion
- H3 Iran wants to make peace with the US this week – if Trump’s ego doesn’t get in the way
- H5 Clinton Fernandes skipped
- H5 Nick Greiner
- H3 Nick Greiner’s parting advice to bring the Libs back from extinction
- H5 City life skipped
- H3 Inside the fight to turn this hard-won Sydney land into housing
- H5 Public transport skipped
- H3 Revealed: The growing cost of delays to opening final stage of Sydney’s M1 metro line
- H5 Income tax skipped
- H3 States warned on spending binge as they all collected record tax takes
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H5 Australian economy
- H3 Lovin’ democracy? You’re probably doing all right, then
- H5 Ross Gittins skipped
- H5 Analysis
- H5 Start-ups
- H3 A $50 billion NDIS is proving too tempting for Australia’s rich-listers
- H5 Colin Kruger skipped
- H5 Federal budget
- H3 Labor to tackle two of budget’s biggest headaches – aged care and NDIS – in one go
- H5 Education skipped
- H3 The secret to the NAPLAN writing test that students aren’t told about
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H5 HSC
- H3 HSC advanced maths exodus adds up. But it points to another problem
- H5 Bronwyn Reid O'Connor skipped
- H5 Property market
- H3 The type of home where prices are falling most right now
- H5 Tax deductions skipped
- H3 How drivers could get bigger tax deductions for car expenses within months
- H5 Wallabies skipped
- H3 The Wallabies will have a stacked back line in 2027. This is why Jorgensen is already excited
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H5 Travel tips
- H3 The nine cities that gave me a terrible first impression
- H5 Ben Groundwater skipped
- H5 Got a Minute?
- H3 Everything’s gone south since our company was acquired. Now what?
- H5 Taste test skipped
- H3 A major chain cheapie takes top spot in the not-so-great supermarket Anzac biscuit taste test
- H5 ★★½ skipped
- H5 Review
- H3 Baby Reindeer wasn’t an easy watch, but Richard Gadd’s new show is punishing
- H5 Spectrum skipped
- H3 Ben Lerner’s gorgeously crafted novel explores the human world of wrong turns
- H2 Just in
- H3 Thinking of selling mum’s silverware? It’s all in the timing
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H3 I’m 67 and working part-time. Should I start drawing on my super?
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H3 Iran wants to make peace with the US this week – if Trump’s ego doesn’t get in the way
- H3 The Wallabies will have a stacked back line in 2027. This is why Jorgensen is already excited
- H2 Editor's Picks
- H5 Updated skipped
- H5 Police
- H3 ‘I haven’t done anything wrong’: Accused Treasury official denies corrupt motive behind data breach
- H5 Analysis skipped
- H5 Science
- H3 Experts linked this popular teen activity with cancer. Then came the backlash
- H5 Angus Dalton skipped
- H5 Opinion
- H5 Sex & relationships
- H3 The manosphere is obsessed with Pilates. It’s about far more than fitness
- H5 Jenna Guillaume skipped
- H2 shorts
- H5 Series skipped
- H3 Healthy, wealthy and retired
- H3 Brought to you by
- H3 The best midlife investment you can make has nothing to do with money
- H3 How do you know when you’re ready to retire?
- H3 Five years ago today I beat breast cancer. This insurance saved me
- H3 Six surprising habits only the happiest retirees get right
- H2 MIDDLE EAST IN CRISIS
- H3 Trump expects ‘great deal’ from Iran talks as ceasefire ticks down
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H3 Trump is an absolute disaster for the oil and gas industry
- H5 Ambrose Evans-Pritchard skipped
- H5 Opinion
- H3 Trump’s madcap folly emboldening this ‘axis of upheaval’
- H5 Peter Hartcher skipped
- H3 Trump has become the star of Iran’s Lego movies
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H3 Australians turn on ‘unreliable, erratic’ Trump as Iran war drags on
- H2 Sydney
- H5 Defamation skipped
- H3 ‘Nuts’: Explosive texts in Rebel Wilson defamation case
- H5 Development skipped
- H3 High-density housing is coming to this Sydney suburb – but not its most exclusive street
- H5 Investigation skipped
- H5 Healthcare
- H3 After her sister died, Jessica went for a check-up. Soon, she too was dead
- H5 Courts skipped
- H3 Principal, teachers accused of assaulting multiple school boys
- H5 City life skipped
- H3 Vote on 20 ways we could improve Sydney
- H2 From our partners
- H5 domain skipped
- H3 What you get for $2 million in a $4 million suburb
- H2 Politics
- H5 Analysis skipped
- H5 Middle East at war
- H3 Fix the budget with more tax on gas? The world’s changed since Pocock’s viral video
- H5 Mike Foley skipped
- H5 Defence
- H3 ‘Star Wars is happening now’: $7b splurge on drone-killing tech
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 Victorian election
- H3 Poised to pounce on a key byelection, One Nation’s campaign committee collapsed
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 Byelection
- H3 One Nation just whingeing, Canavan says as Coalition swaps preferences
- H2 Business
- H5 Watch skipped
- H5 Aviation
- H3 Thousands of nervous flyers come to him for help. This is what he tells them
- H5 Analysis skipped
- H5 Gadgets
- H3 What can we expect from Apple’s next boss?
- H5 Tim Biggs skipped
- H5 Iron ore
- H3 Fortescue launches ad blitz against billion-dollar diesel tax ‘handouts’
- H5 Aviation skipped
- H3 Qantas, Virgin launch domestic ticket deals to fill cash coffers in Iran crisis
- H2 World
- H5 Analysis skipped
- H5 UK politics
- H3 A comedian could not have done a better job than Starmer’s earnest pitch to parliament
- H5 David Crowe skipped
- H5 Drugs
- H3 These salmon got high on cocaine. That wasn’t the craziest part
- H5 Updated skipped
- H5 US politics
- H3 Trump loses third cabinet member, FBI boss sues over ‘problem drinker’ story
- H5 Mass shooting skipped
- H3 ‘Horrific act’: Tourist killed as gunman opens fire at Mexico pyramids
- H2 Opinion
- H3 The massive ‘care gaps’ exposing Australia’s aged care crisis
- H5 Rachel Lane skipped
- H3 I want to leave all my money to my kids; the government has different ideas
- H5 Jenna Price skipped
- H3 Special treatment for Ben Roberts-Smith needs a better explanation
- H5 The Herald's View skipped
- H3 The day Prince died ended an era. Ten years on, the loss still lingers
- H5 George Palathingal skipped
- H2 Explore
- H4 Premium skipped
- H4 Got a news tip?
- H2 Property
- H5 Title Deeds skipped
- H3 ‘Love living there’: Why ex-Woolies boss Brad Banducci decided not to move
- H5 Auctions skipped
- H3 ‘Spectacular’: Local family pays $8.95m on northern beaches
- H5 Construction skipped
- H3 What the reality TV reno shows don’t tell you
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 Title Deeds
- H3 Freight boss sells $11m home in elite Sydney suburb
- H5 Auctions skipped
- H3 ‘We fell in love with it’: Unrenovated inner west home sells for $2.4 million
- H2 Good Food
- H5 MasterChef Recap skipped
- H3 The front-runners, the dark horses and the one who will rub you up the wrong way on MasterChef
- H5 Review skipped
- H5 Newtown
- H3 ‘Bedrock of Australia Street’: Why this Newtown spot remains a firm favourite
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 Just open
- H3 First look at legendary Leichhardt restaurant Grappa’s upmarket spin-off
- H5 Good Food events skipped
- H3 Is takeaway the future of dining? The stats suggest yes, but the industry is adapting
- H2 Lifestyle
- H5 Sex & relationships skipped
- H3 Signs you may be a ‘placeholder partner’ in your relationship
- H5 Fitness skipped
- H3 Too tired to exercise? These tips will get your energy up
- H5 Sunday Life skipped
- H3 The breakfast swap a dietitian prescribes this fitness influencer for better energy payoff
- H5 Sunday Life skipped
- H3 Kathy Lette wanted a trip to make her feel young again. Here’s where she went
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 Prostate cancer
- H3 It’s the deadliest cancer for Australian men. This test could be life-saving for many, and their daughters
- H2 Culture
- H5 Exit interview skipped
- H5 Reality TV
- H3 Laura Byrne worried about one thing covering MAFS. It became her favourite part
- H5 Cinema skipped
- H3 Daniel MacPherson: ‘I had a broken nose, fractured pelvis and still kept fighting’
- H5 Vale skipped
- H3 Melrose Place and Starship Troopers star dies suddenly
- H5 Review skipped
- H3 What to stream this week: Elle Fanning’s gutsy sex work dramedy, plus five more new picks
- H5 Literature skipped
- H3 How AI is trying to rival a creative mind when it comes to writing novels
- H2 Traveller
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H5 Travel tips
- H3 The nine cities that gave me a terrible first impression
- H5 ★★★½ skipped
- H5 Hotel reviews
- H3 After 26 years, Australians still flock to this sprawling Pacific island resort
- H5 Queensland skipped
- H3 The unexpectedly cool Queensland town you’ve probably never heard of
- H5 Europe skipped
- H3 A town’s unique fountain made us change our honeymoon route
- H2 Drivedrive
- H3 Why a damaged car could be the cheapest way into the EV market
- H3 The tech-laden hybrid SUV that proves sometimes less is more
- H3 Australia and China keep gifting cars to other countries – here's why
- H2 From Our Partners
- H5 stan skipped
- H3 Starring Elizabeth Banks and Matthew Macfadyen, The Miniature Wife is streaming now, only on Stan.
- H5 stan skipped
- H3 Stan has your exclusive backstage pass to all the drama with MAFS: After The Dinner Party. Streaming now, exclusively on Stan.
- H2 Sport
- H5 Wallabies skipped
- H3 The Wallabies will have a stacked back line in 2027. This is why Jorgensen is already excited
- H5 NRL 2026 skipped
- H3 ‘No one knows the club like me’: Dean Young embraces tough task at Dragons
- H5 NRL 2026 skipped
- H3 The Kokoda lessons Daly Cherry-Evans will never forget
- H5 NRL 2026 skipped
- H3 Young talent time: Kade Reed to debut, Kyle Flanagan dropped
- H5 Australian rugby skipped
- H3 Lions help RA post record $70m profit as Wallabies get good news on star duo
- H5 Updated skipped
- H5 Around the clubs
- H3 ‘Sky’s the limit’: Rabbitohs stars back versatile teammate to play Origin
- H5 Club rugby skipped
- H3 Former league star Phil Blake sues club over sacking as coach
- H2 Have Your Say
- H3 Dragons take aim at ‘personal agendas’ but Flanagan got a good run
- H5 Chris Barrett skipped
- H2 More in Sport
- H5 Soccer skipped
- H3 City star Haaland relishes the moment as Arsenal slide continues
- H5 Updated skipped
- H5 AFL
- H3 Further drug test details emerge as Ollie Hollands sends loving message to Elijah
- H5 Updated skipped
- H5 NRL
- H3 Dean Young takes over as interim head coach after Dragons part ways with Flanagan
- H5 NRL skipped
- H3 Daley backs Blues depth after Haas ruled out of Origin series opener
- H5 Analysis skipped
- H5 NRL
- H3 The Sunday breakfast that sealed Flanagan’s fate at the Dragons
- H5 Updated skipped
- H5 AFL
- H3 Carlton say Elijah Hollands has been admitted to hospital
- H5 Exclusive skipped
- H5 AFL
- H3 ‘There was a bit of chatter’: Pie aware of Hollands talk on field
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H5 NRL
- H3 Why the Dragons will overlook the most obvious replacement for Shane Flanagan
- H2 Featured video
- H5 AFL skipped
- H3 AFL demands answers on Hollands saga
- H2 Racing
- H5 Horse racing skipped
- H3 Tips and race-by-race guide for Canterbury on Wednesday
- H5 Horse racing skipped
- H3 Charlton content to bide his time with ‘immature’ gelding
- H5 Horse racing skipped
- H3 Waller’s Sydney autumn domination ends with double delight
- H2 Most Viewed today
- H3 Young talent time: Kade Reed to debut, Kyle Flanagan dropped
- H3 US-Iran war as it happened: Trump says he won’t be ‘rushed into making a bad deal’; Vance to lead US delegation in Pakistan for peace talks with Iran as ceasefire deadline nears
- H3 High-density housing is coming to this Sydney suburb – but not its most exclusive street
- H3 The world’s 10 most beautiful libraries every book-lover should visit
- H3 Former league star Phil Blake sues club over sacking as coach
- H5 Opinion skipped
- H3 My flight to Europe is cancelled. I’m nervous about accepting the replacement
- H3 After her sister died, Jessica went for a check-up. Four months later, she was dead
- H3 Special treatment for Ben Roberts-Smith needs a better explanation
- H3 ‘Never waste a crisis’: Ex-Shell executive says it’s time for Australia to tax windfall profits on energy
- H2 The Sydney Morning Herald
- H3 Our Sites
- H3 Classifieds
- H3 The Sydney Morning Herald
- H3 Products & Services
- H1 We value your privacy. With your consent we use data to do the following: duplicate H1
- H1 Manage your data duplicate H1
- H2 Store and/or access information on a device
- H2 Use limited data to select advertising
- H2 Create profiles for personalised advertising
- H2 Use profiles to select personalised advertising
- H2 Create profiles to personalise content
- H2 Use profiles to select personalised content
- H2 Measure advertising performance
- H2 Measure content performance
- H2 Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources
- H2 Develop and improve services
- H2 Use limited data to select content
- H2 Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors
- H2 Deliver and present advertising and content
- H2 Save and communicate privacy choices
- H2 Match and combine data from other data sources
- H2 Link different devices
- H2 Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically
- H2 Use precise geolocation data
- H2 Storage, duration, and usage details
- H1 Confirm our vendors duplicate H1
- H2 Exponential Interactive, Inc d/b/a VDX.tv
- H2 Index Exchange Inc.
- H2 Quantcast
- H2 BeeswaxIO Corporation
- H2 Sovrn, Inc.
- H2 Adkernel LLC
- H2 Adikteev
- H2 RTB House S.A.
- H2 The UK Trade Desk Ltd
- H2 Nexxen Inc.
- H2 Epsilon
- H2 Yahoo EMEA Limited
- H2 ADventori SAS
- H2 Triple Lift, Inc.
- H2 Xandr, Inc.
- H2 Nexxen Group LLC
- H2 NEURAL.ONE
- H2 ADITION (Virtual Minds GmbH)
- H2 Active Agent (Virtual Minds GmbH)
- H2 Equativ
- H2 Adform A/S
- H2 Magnite, Inc.
- H2 RATEGAIN ADARA INC
- H2 Sift Media, Inc
- H2 Lumen Research Limited
- H2 OpenX
- H2 Yieldlab (Virtual Minds GmbH)
- H2 Simplifi Holdings LLC
- H2 PubMatic, Inc
- H2 Comscore B.V.
- H2 Flashtalking
- H2 Sharethrough, Inc
- H2 PulsePoint, Inc.
- H2 Smaato, Inc.
- H2 Crimtan Holdings Limited
- H2 Criteo SA
- H2 SCOPE3 SAS
- H2 LiveRamp
- H2 WPP Media
- H2 Sonobi, Inc
- H2 LoopMe Limited
- H2 Dynata LLC
- H2 Ask Locala
- H2 Azira
- H2 DoubleVerify Inc.
- H2 BIDSWITCH GmbH
- H2 IPONWEB GmbH
- H2 NextRoll, Inc.
- H2 Media.net Advertising FZ-LLC
- H2 LiveIntent Inc.
- H2 Basis Global Technologies, Inc.
- H2 Seedtag Advertising S.L
- H2 SMADEX, S.L.U.
- H2 Bombora Inc.
- H2 Outbrain UK.
- H2 Yieldmo, Inc.
- H2 A Million Ads
- H2 Remerge GmbH
- H2 Affle Iberia SL
- H2 Magnite CTV, Inc.
- H2 Delta Projects AB
- H2 Zemanta Inc.
- H2 AcuityAds Inc.
- H2 Rockerbox, Inc
- H2 StackAdapt Inc.
- H2 OneTag Limited
- H2 Smartology Limited
- H2 Improve Digital
- H2 Adobe Advertising Cloud
- H2 Bannerflow AB
- H2 TabMo SAS
- H2 Integral Ad Science (incorporating ADmantX)
- H2 Wizaly
- H2 Weborama
- H2 Readpeak Oy
- H2 Jivox Corporation
- H2 Sojern, Inc.
- H2 Polar Mobile Group Inc.
- H2 On Device Research Limited
- H2 Exactag GmbH
- H2 Celtra Inc.
- H2 ADTIMING TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD
- H2 Gemius SA
- H2 InMobi Pte Ltd
- H2 The Kantar Group Limited
- H2 Samba TV UK Limited
- H2 Nielsen Media Research Ltd.
- H2 RevX
- H2 Pixalate, Inc.
- H2 Triapodi Ltd. d/b/a Digital Turbine
- H2 AudienceProject A/S
- H2 Eulerian Technologies
- H2 Seenthis AB
- H2 travel audience GmbH
- H2 HUMAN
- H2 Streamwise srl
- H2 Innovid LLC
- H2 Zeta Global Corp.
- H2 Madington
- H2 Opinary (Affinity Global GmbH)
- H2 GumGum, Inc.
- H2 Cint USA, Inc.
- H2 Jampp LTD
- H2 Realtime Technologies GmbH
- H2 DeepIntent, Inc.
- H2 Happydemics
- H2 Otto GmbH & Co. KGaA
- H2 Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Experience Platform
- H2 CHEQ AI TECHNOLOGIES
- H2 Localsensor B.V.
- H2 Adnami Aps
- H2 Blue
- H2 Relay42 Netherlands B.V.
- H2 Mobsuccess
- H2 Liftoff Monetize and Vungle Exchange
- H2 The MediaGrid Inc.
- H2 Go.pl sp. z o.o.
- H2 HyperTV, Inc.
- H2 Appier PTE Ltd
- H2 6Sense Insights, Inc.
- H2 Google Advertising Products
- H2 GfK GmbH
- H2 Clinch Labs LTD
- H2 Amazon Ads
- H2 LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company
- H2 Moloco, Inc.
- H2 Nielsen International SA
- H2 Mintegral International Limited
- H2 PRECISO SRL
- H2 Pelmorex Corp.
- H2 TikTok Ad Network
- H2 Extreme Reach, Inc
- H2 Somplo Ltd
- H2 Adelaide Metrics Inc
- H2 Baidu (Hong Kong) Limited
- H2 Arpeely Ltd.
- H2 Adventure Media SARL
- H2 Microsoft Advertising
- H2 Opera Software Ireland Limited
- H2 xpln.ai SAS
- H2 ABCS INSIGHTS
- H2 Affle Inc
- H2 Admaster Private Limited
- H2 Bidease Inc
- H2 Intango Ltd
- H2 Artsai
- H2 Meta
- H2 C3 Metrics
- H2 Roku Advertising Services
- H2 eBay
- H2 Evidon
- H2 GroovinAds
- H2 Sizmek
- H2 Equativ
- H2 SMN Corporation
- H2 TrustArc
- H2 CyberAgent
- H2 MicroAd
- H2 AdMaxim
- H2 Magnite
- H2 Yango
- H2 Singular Labs Inc.
- H2 Neustar
- H2 Netquest
- H2 Cloudflare
- H2 Salesforce DMP
- H2 Bridgewell
- H2 AppLovin Corp.
- H2 AdTheorent, Inc.
- H2 Rackspace
- H2 Placed
- H2 Aarki
- H2 NinthDecimal
- H2 TreSensa
- H2 Bigabid
- H2 Optimize LCC D.B.A Genius Monkey
- H2 gskinner
- H2 Yahoo! Japan
- H2 Chalk Digital
- H2 jsdelivr
- H2 HockeyCurve
- H2 Upwave
- H2 IQM
- H2 fluct
- H2 Zucks
- H2 UNICORN
- H2 AdFalcon
- H2 Supership
- H2 Marketing Science Consulting Group, Inc.
- H2 Kobler
- H2 Adstra
- H2 Persona.ly
- H2 Oracle Data Cloud
- H2 Throtle
- H2 ironSource Mobile
- H2 MediaPal
- H2 Tuky Data
- H2 CONTXTFUL
- H2 MarketCast LLC
- H2 LeadsRx
- H2 clean.io
- H2 Unity Ads
- H2 Loblaw Media
- H2 Ad Lightning
- H2 Lacuna
- H2 Coupang
- H2 Playable Factory
- H2 Prism Partner
- H2 TemuDSP
- H2 DISQO
- H2 Mercado Livre
- H1 (empty)
A page should have only one H1. Multiple H1s dilute the document outline.
Multiple H1s blur the page's primary topic — screen-reader users and Google both prefer one H1.
Learn more ▾ ▴
HTML5's outline algorithm technically allows multiple H1s within sectioning content, but no browser implements it. In practice: one H1 per page. Use H2-H6 for subsections.
Source: WCAG 2.4.6 / Google Search Central
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Empty headings appear in the document outline but provide no information.
Empty <hN> tags break the document outline — screen-reader users navigating by heading hit dead silence.
Source: WCAG 2.4.6
DFavicon & BrandingAction3 icon(s) detectedFIX
DWeb ManifestActionNot foundFIX
No web manifest found.
DDark Mode SupportActionTheme color onlyFIX
Detection limited to meta tags and inline styles.
DPrint StylesheetActionNo print stylesFIX
BAlt Text Quality4 of 109 images have issuesREVIEW
| Issue | Count |
|---|---|
| missing | 1 image(s) |
| generic | 3 image(s) |
| too long | 6 image(s) |
Images without alt text are invisible to screen readers.
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
Learn more ▾ ▴
WCAG 2.1 Level A requires text alternatives for non-decorative images. Empty alt='' is fine for decorative; meaningful images need descriptive text. Common fixes: CMS audit + bulk add, build-time linter (alt-text-required ESLint rule), CI gate on Lighthouse a11y score.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.1.1 / WebAIM Million Report
CLink & Button QualityAction146 issue(s) across 1176 links and 116 buttonsREVIEW
| Element | Text | Issue | Suggested Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://tvguide.smh.com.au | TV guide | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au | Drive | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://omny.fm/shows/please-explain-1/p… | The Morning Edition podcast | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://omny.fm/shows/please-explain-1/p… | The Morning Edition podcast | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.smh.com.au/puzzles/crossword… | Play our new Mini Crossword. | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.smh.com.au/puzzles/crossword… | Mini Crossword | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| http://www.bom.gov.au/nsw/forecasts/sydn… | SydneyWeather forecast | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.australianunity.com.au/ | Australian Unity | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.domain.com.au/news/what-you-… | What you get for $2 million in… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.domain.com.au/news/what-you-… | What you get for $2 million in… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| /confidential-news-tips | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Confidential News Tips | |||
| https://www.domain.com.au | Domain | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au | Drivedrive | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/econo… | Why a damaged car could be the… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/econo… | Why a damaged car could be the… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au/reviews/2026-mg… | The tech-laden hybrid SUV that… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au/reviews/2026-mg… | The tech-laden hybrid SUV that… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/austr… | Australia and China keep gifti… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/austr… | Australia and China keep gifti… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.stan.com.au/watch/the-miniat… | Starring Elizabeth Banks and M… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.stan.com.au/watch/the-miniat… | Starring Elizabeth Banks and M… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.stan.com.au/watch/mafs-after… | Stan has your exclusive backst… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.stan.com.au/watch/mafs-after… | Stan has your exclusive backst… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://twitter.com/smh | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text | |
| http://www.facebook.com/sydneymorningher… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text | |
| https://www.instagram.com/sydneymorningh… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text | |
| /rssheadlines | RSS | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
| # | more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: more Suggested: # | |||
Generic link text like 'click here' doesn't describe the destination.
/confidential-news-tips ("Learn more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more"); # ("more") (+136 more)
Generic anchor text ('click here', 'read more', 'learn more') tells screen readers and search engines nothing about the destination.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Out-of-context lists of links read by AT (one navigation pattern) become useless when every link says 'click here'. Use the destination's title or topic as anchor text. Doubles as SEO win — Google passes anchor-text relevance to the destination.
Source: WCAG 2.4.4 / Google Search Central
Add '(opens in new tab)' to link text or aria-label.
https://tvguide.smh.com.au; https://www.drive.com.au; https://omny.fm/shows/please-explain-1/playlists/podcast; https://omny.fm/shows/please-explain-1/playlists/podcast; https://www.smh.com.au/puzzles/crosswords?promote_channel=CTA_HI_ENG&utm_sour…; https://www.smh.com.au/puzzles/crosswords?promote_channel=CTA_HI_ENG&utm_sour…; http://www.bom.gov.au/nsw/forecasts/sydney.shtml; https://www.australianunity.com.au/; https://www.domain.com.au/news/what-you-get-for-2-million-in-a-4-million-subu…; https://www.domain.com.au/news/what-you-get-for-2-million-in-a-4-million-subu… (+16 more)
Links with target="_blank" without rel="noopener" leak the originating page's window context — security and UX issue.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Without rel="noopener", the new tab can navigate the original tab via window.opener (tab-nabbing attack). Modern browsers default to noopener for target=_blank but only since recent versions. Always set rel="noopener noreferrer" explicitly.
Source: MDN target / OWASP
BColor Contrast (Screenshot)20 text elements analyzed, 0 fail WCAG AAREVIEW
Analyzes text contrast against the actual rendered page, including background images, gradients, and overlays that CSS-based tools cannot detect.
Show all checked elements (20)
| Element | Ratio | Required | FG | BG | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h1 The Sydney Morning H… | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h1 We value your privac… | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h1 Manage your data | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h1 Confirm our vendors | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 The Sydney Morning H… | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Editor's Picks | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 shorts | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 From our partners | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Explore | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 From Our Partners | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Have Your Say | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 More in Sport | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Featured video | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Most Viewed today | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 The Sydney Morning H… | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Store and/or access … | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Use limited data to … | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Create profiles for … | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Use profiles to sele… | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
| h2 Create profiles to p… | 3.66:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #666666 | Pass |
Methodology: The top 20 text elements by font size were checked. Background color was sampled from the desktop screenshot using a 5-point pattern. WCAG 2.1 AA requires 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text.
BLighthouse Accessibility AuditsScore 83/100 — 5 failing, 25 passedREVIEW
Accessibility
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your web app. Automatic detection can only detect a subset of issues and does not guarantee the accessibility of your web app, so manual testing is also encouraged.
Contrast
Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Learn how to provide sufficient color contrast.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
Money contributor div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > p.LhCcW |
Columnist div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > p.LhCcW |
Editorial div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > p.LhCcW |
Senior music writer div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > p.LhCcW |
Learn more div.fc-dialog-content > div.fc-dialog-scrollable-content > button.fc-faq-header > span.fc-faq-label |
List of partners. div.fc-dialog-scrollable-content > div.fc-footer > p > a.fc-vendors-list-dialog |
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Names and labels
Informative elements should aim for short, descriptive alternate text. Decorative elements can be ignored with an empty alt attribute. Learn more about the `alt` attribute.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
a > div.pc0-m > picture > img.ZAk8w |
a > div.pc0-m > picture > img.ZAk8w |
a > div.pc0-m > picture > img.ZAk8w |
Screen reader users rely on frame titles to describe the contents of frames. Learn more about frame titles.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
div.YzFy- > div#homepage-header-subscribe-button-piano-id > div.tp-container-inner > iframe#offer_9fadc4fc427b415c63ed-0 div.YzFy- > div#homepage-header-subscribe-button-piano-id > div.tp-container-inner > iframe#offer_9fadc4fc427b415c63ed-0 |
Link text (and alternate text for images, when used as links) that is discernible, unique, and focusable improves the navigation experience for screen reader users. Learn how to make links accessible.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
div.Gg84- > div.qWp8L > figure.-RwuQ > a |
div.dgB04 > div.qWp8L > figure.-RwuQ > a |
div.dgB04 > div.qWp8L > figure.-RwuQ > a |
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Navigation
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. Learn more about heading order.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
Live div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.Lxtfy |
Exclusive div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Opinion div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Clinton Fernandes div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
City life div.C0fem > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Public transport div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Income tax div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Opinion div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Ross Gittins div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Colin Kruger div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > h5.VM6Jl |
Education div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Opinion div.C0fem > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Bronwyn Reid O'Connor div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Tax deductions div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Wallabies div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Opinion div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Ben Groundwater div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Taste test div.nNhKL > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
★★½ div.-tzWc > div.qWp8L > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Spectrum div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Opinion div > div.bcQQs > div.AcFMr > h5._6nsXK |
Opinion div > div.bcQQs > div.AcFMr > h5._6nsXK |
Updated div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Analysis div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Angus Dalton div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > h5.VM6Jl |
Jenna Guillaume div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Series div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Opinion div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Peter Hartcher div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Defamation div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Development div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Investigation div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Courts div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
City life div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Domain div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.Kc1uy |
Analysis div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Mike Foley div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > h5.VM6Jl |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Watch div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Analysis div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Tim Biggs div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > h5.VM6Jl |
Aviation div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Analysis div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
David Crowe div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > h5.VM6Jl |
Updated div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Mass shooting div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Rachel Lane div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
Jenna Price div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
The Herald's View div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
George Palathingal div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
PREMIUM div > section.vov3Q > div._1ooGP > h4._4wR92 |
Title Deeds div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Auctions div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Construction div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Auctions div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
MasterChef Recap div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Review div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Good Food events div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Sex & relationships div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Fitness div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Sunday Life div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Sunday Life div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Exit interview div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Cinema div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Vale div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Review div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Literature div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Opinion div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
★★★½ div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Queensland div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Europe div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Stan div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.Kc1uy |
Stan div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.Kc1uy |
Wallabies div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
NRL 2026 div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
NRL 2026 div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
NRL 2026 div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Australian rugby div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Updated div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5._77RNt |
Club rugby div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Chris Barrett div.z3g3Y > div.vwQJl > div > h5.VM6Jl |
SOCCER div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.WXkF7 |
Updated div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
Updated div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
NRL div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.WXkF7 |
Analysis div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
Updated div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
Exclusive div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
Opinion div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
AFL div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Horse racing div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Horse racing div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Horse racing div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.EKPfZ > h5.bxWRo |
Opinion div.qWp8L > div.z3g3Y > div.FPWpc > h5.HlHTW |
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
ALandmark Structure37 landmarksPASS
Multiple navigations need aria-label to distinguish them for screen readers.
Some <nav> elements lack aria-label — screen-reader users hear 'navigation' multiple times with no way to distinguish them.
Learn more ▾ ▴
When a page has multiple <nav> regions (primary, footer, breadcrumb), each needs aria-label or aria-labelledby. AT users navigate by landmark; identical 'navigation' announcements force them to enter each one to discover purpose.
Source: WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices
AForm Accessibility1 of 284 controls have issuesPASS
| Control | Type | Label | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| #site-search | search | Search Site | for/id |
| input | checkbox | Consent (123 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (75 vendors) | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-purpose-2 | checkbox | Legitimate interest (41 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (106 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (106 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (31 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (29 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (76 vendors) | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-purpose-7 | checkbox | Legitimate interest (59 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (30 vendors) | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-purpose-8 | checkbox | Legitimate interest (21 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (57 vendors) | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-purpose-9 | checkbox | Legitimate interest (31 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (64 vendors) | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-purpose-10 | checkbox | Legitimate interest (51 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent (14 vendors) | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-purpose-11 | checkbox | Legitimate interest (5 vendors) | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-11 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-14 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-15 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-21 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-23 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-28 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-32 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-36 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-50 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-52 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-69 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-76 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-85 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-93 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-98 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-104 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-124 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-126 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-142 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-156 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-163 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-173 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-192 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-202 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-209 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-231 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-232 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-238 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-246 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-253 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-264 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-278 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-284 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-290 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-294 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-297 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-394 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-431 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-452 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-486 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-527 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-528 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-541 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-559 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-612 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-667 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-690 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-699 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-728 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-740 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-755 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-767 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-804 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-807 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-812 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-867 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-986 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1005 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1019 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1067 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1071 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1135 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1142 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1391 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| #fc-preference-slider-gvl-vendor-1412 | checkbox | Legitimate interest | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | checkbox | Consent | none |
| input | submit | (none) | none |
Form controls need a <label>, aria-label, or aria-labelledby for screen readers.
<input type="submit">
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 3.3.2