Skip to content
https://wired.co.uk

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
54
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
10.11g CO2 per view
FIX
10.11g CO2 per view
Critical::
10.11g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 35.7 MB, producing an estimated 10.11g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 1.87g, network 1.75g, end-user device 6.49g.
Got: 10.11g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 1212.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 1212.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 151607 smartphones.

10.11g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 35.7 MB

Your site
10.11g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
1.87g
Network
1.75g
End-user device
6.49g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 101.1 kg · Annual: 1212.9 kg · ≈ 151607 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Snowplow AnalyticsCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
10.11g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

10.11g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 1585% more
vs Target 1921% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 168 KB (vs 36545 KB first visit). 127 of 128 resources are served from browser cache, saving 10.06g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.05g CO2 (first visit: 10.11g)
First visit
36545 KB
Repeat visit
168 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 10.06g CO2 per returning visitor

127 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 1069 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 1069 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 1069 KB

0.30g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 36545 KB
Theoretical minimum 35476 KB
Potential savings 1069 KB (0.30g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback