Skip to content

Category: Personalisation

Cordial

Based on 3 real audits

29
Avg. Performance
81
Avg. Accessibility
82
Avg. Best Practices
84
Avg. SEO
70
Avg. Security
71
Avg. Composite
29 /100
Avg. Performance
84 ms
Avg. TTFB
71 /100
Avg. Composite
3
Sites Audited

How Cordial sites compare

Cordial sites tend to score below average on performance (29/100), compared to the global average of 66/100.

Recent Audits

See all 3 websites using Cordial →
SitePerformanceGradeAudited
essence.com17C2026-04-22
beautybakerie.com45C2026-04-08
www.forbes.com25C2026-04-04

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Cordial also commonly use:

core-js JavaScript libraries 3Priority Hints Performance 3Google Tag Manager Tag managers 3Google Analytics Analytics 3Open Graph Miscellaneous 3Swiper JavaScript libraries 2React JavaScript frameworks 2Pushly Widgets 2Cloudflare CDN 2Facebook SDK Analytics 2

Compare with...

Cordial vs core-jsCordial vs Priority HintsCordial vs Google Tag ManagerCordial vs Google AnalyticsCordial vs Open GraphCordial vs SwiperCordial vs ReactCordial vs PushlyCordial vs CloudflareCordial vs Facebook SDK

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Cordial sites?
Based on 3 real audits, Cordial sites score an average of 29/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Cordial compare on web security?
Cordial sites score an average security grade of 70/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Cordial websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Cordial sites is 84ms based on 3 audits.
How can I improve my Cordial site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Cordial site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Cordial site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback