Skip to content

Cordial

Based on 1 real audits

25
Avg. Performance
83
Avg. Accessibility
73
Avg. Best Practices
85
Avg. SEO
75
Avg. Security
71
Avg. Composite
25 /100
Avg. Performance
46 ms
Avg. TTFB
71 /100
Avg. Composite
1
Sites Audited

How Cordial sites compare

Cordial sites tend to score below average on performance (25/100), compared to the global average of 49/100.

Recent Audits

SitePerformanceGradeAudited
www.forbes.com25C2026-04-04

Commonly Used With

Sites that use Cordial also commonly use:

Webpack Miscellaneous 1Varnish Caching 1Twitter Ads Advertising 1TripleLift Advertising 1Swiper JavaScript libraries 1SpeedCurve RUM 1reCAPTCHA Security 1React JavaScript frameworks 1Quantcast Measure Analytics 1Qualtrics Surveys 1

Compare with...

Cordial vs WebpackCordial vs VarnishCordial vs Twitter AdsCordial vs TripleLiftCordial vs SwiperCordial vs SpeedCurveCordial vs reCAPTCHACordial vs ReactCordial vs Quantcast MeasureCordial vs Qualtrics

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for Cordial sites?
Based on 1 real audits, Cordial sites score an average of 25/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does Cordial compare on web security?
Cordial sites score an average security grade of 75/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for Cordial websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for Cordial sites is 46ms based on 1 audits.
How can I improve my Cordial site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your Cordial site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your Cordial site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback