Skip to content

VideoJS

Based on 1 real audits

25
Avg. Performance
79
Avg. Accessibility
77
Avg. Best Practices
85
Avg. SEO
67
Avg. Security
71
Avg. Composite
25 /100
Avg. Performance
257 ms
Avg. TTFB
71 /100
Avg. Composite
1
Sites Audited

How VideoJS sites compare

VideoJS sites tend to score below average on performance (25/100), compared to the global average of 49/100.

Recent Audits

SitePerformanceGradeAudited
www.nike.com25C2026-04-04

Commonly Used With

Sites that use VideoJS also commonly use:

Zipkin Analytics 1Webpack Miscellaneous 1Underscore.js JavaScript libraries 1React JavaScript frameworks 1Open Graph Miscellaneous 1Next.js JavaScript frameworks 1New Relic RUM 1Kasada Security 1HSTS Security 1Emotion JavaScript frameworks 1

Compare with...

VideoJS vs ZipkinVideoJS vs WebpackVideoJS vs Underscore.jsVideoJS vs ReactVideoJS vs Open GraphVideoJS vs Next.jsVideoJS vs New RelicVideoJS vs KasadaVideoJS vs HSTSVideoJS vs Emotion

FAQ

What is the average Lighthouse performance score for VideoJS sites?
Based on 1 real audits, VideoJS sites score an average of 25/100 on Lighthouse performance.
How does VideoJS compare on web security?
VideoJS sites score an average security grade of 67/100 in BeaverCheck audits.
What is the average page load time for VideoJS websites?
The average Time to First Byte (TTFB) for VideoJS sites is 257ms based on 1 audits.
How can I improve my VideoJS site's performance?
Run a free audit on BeaverCheck to get specific recommendations for your VideoJS site. Common issues include render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and missing caching headers.

Audit your VideoJS site now

Run Audit

Send Feedback